Impact Damage Resistance of Thin-Core Sandwich Structures Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact

Abstract:

This paper aims at evaluating the damage resistance of thin core sandwich structures, composed of aramid paper honeycomb core and carbon/ epoxy laminates face-sheets subjected to low velocity impact. The impact tests are performed using the instrumented impact-testing machine and resulting impact damages are inspected by Ultrasonic C-scan. In order to study the failure process of the core, which is important in the damage of the structures, flatwise compression test was carried out. Four parameters have been analyzed as follows: maximum load, total energy absorbed during impact, impact dent depth, and impact damage area. Nearly all impact force histories of panels have “twin peaks”, but the second peak of the 3mm-core structure is much larger than the first, which is quite different from others, when impact energy reached 5J, which were caused by the thickness of the core. Impact damages of thin-core sandwich structures are mainly delamination in the face-sheet and core crushing at low energy, and fiber breakage at relatively high energy. The damage processes of different groups of structures are essentially different and the impact resistance of the sandwich structure is greatly influenced by the face-sheet and core thickness.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 684)
• Pages: 176-181
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.684.176
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Kai Lun Wang, Zhi Dong Guan*, Jun Guo, Zeng Shan Li
• Keywords: Impact Damage Resistance, Low-Velocity Impact, Nomex Honeycomb Sandwich Structure, Thin Core

References

[1] Abrate, S.: Impact on laminated composite laminates. Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, 155–190 (1991).

[2] Abrate, S.: Localized Impact on Sandwich Structures with Laminated Facings, Applied Mechanics Review, 50: 69–82 (1997).

DOI: 10.1115/1.3101689

[3] Aymerich F., Pani C., Priolo P.: Effect of stitching on the low-velocity impact response of [03/903]s graphite/epoxy laminates. Composite Part A 38, 1174–1182 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.005

[4] J.H. Park, S.K. Ha, K.W. Kang, C.W. Kim, H.S. Kim: Impact damage resistance of sandwich structure subjected to low velocity impact. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 201: 425–430 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.196

[5] Cheng xiaoquan, Kou Changhe, Li Zhengneng: Compression of Composite Honeycomb Core Sandwich Panels after Low Velocity Impact. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. October; Vol. 24 No15; 551-554 (1998).

[6] Shih WK, Jang BZ: Instrumented impact testing of composite sandwich panels. Journal of Reinforced Plastics Composite; 8: 271–98 (1989).

DOI: 10.1177/073168448900800304

[7] Chun LU, Lam KY: Behavior of uniform anisotropic beams of rectangular section under transverse impact of a mass. Shock and Vibration; 4(2): 125–41 (1997).

DOI: 10.1155/1997/187215

[8] Robinson P, Davies GAO: Impactor mass and specimen geometry effects in low velocity impact of laminated composites. International Journal of Impact Engineering; 12(2): 189–207 (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(92)90408-l

[9] Rosenfeld MS, Gause LW: Compression fatigue behavior of graphite/epoxy in the presence of stress raisers. In: Fatigue of fibrous composite materials, ASTM STP723; 1981. p.174–96.

DOI: 10.1520/stp27620s

[10] Kim CG, Jun EJ: Journal of Composite Materials; 26(15): 2247 (1992).

[11] Dear, J.P., Lee, H., Brown, S.A.: Impact damage process in composite sheet and sandwich honeycomb materials. Int. J. Impact Eng. 32, 130–154 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.02.005

[12] G. Zhou and M.D. Hill: Impact Damage and Energy-absorbing Characteristics and Residual In-plane Compressive Strength of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 11: 329 (2009).

DOI: 10.1177/1099636209105704

[13] Zhou, G. and Rivera, L.: Investigation for the Reduction of In-plane Compressive Strength in Preconditioned Thick Composite Panels, Journal of Composite Materials, 41: 1961–1994 (2007).

DOI: 10.1177/0021998307070590