Design and Performance Evaluation of Distributed Virtual Router Based on OpenStack

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the booming of Cloud Compute, OpenStack has been more widely used in Data Center, but in tradition deployment of OpenStack, the traffic must traverse network node to get routing decision. So the network node would be a bottle-neck due to the increasing amount of data flow. In order to solve this problem, this paper propose an extensible design, we create a internal virtual router in each compute node, the internal virtual router just can process the East-West traffic in lay2. With the help of distributed router, the East-West traffic can be delivered directly from the source hypervisor to the destination hypervisor, no longer need to traverse the router in network node to get routing decision, Therefore, North-South and East-West traffic don't impact each other anymore. North-South traffic enjoys all the bandwidth of router in network node exclusively, hence reduce the load of the network node. Experiment results show that OpenStack with distributed router has a much better performance evaluation than original OpenStack. This will dramatically increase the total bandwidth, and also bring other advantages.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2888-2892

Citation:

Online since:

November 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Michael Armbrust , Armando Fox , Rean Griffith et al, A view of cloud computing, Communications of the ACM, v. 53 n. 4, April (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] Salman Baset. Open source cloud technologies., Proceedings of the Third ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing. ACM, (2012).

DOI: 10.1145/2391229.2391257

Google Scholar

[3] Xiaolong Wen, Genqiang Gu, Qingchun Li, et al. Comparison of open-source cloud management platforms: OpenStack and OpenNebula., Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2012 9th International Conference on. IEEE, (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/fskd.2012.6234218

Google Scholar

[4] Guohui Wang, and T. S. Eugene Ng. The impact of virtualization on network performance of amazon ec2 data center., INFOCOM, 2010 Proceedings IEEE. IEEE, (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2010.5461931

Google Scholar

[5] Antonio Corradi, Mario Fanelli , and Luca Foschinii. VM consolidation: a real case based on OpenStack cloud., Future Generation Computer Systems 32 (2014): 118-127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2012.05.012

Google Scholar

[6] Yu Huanle, Shi Weifeng, and Bai Tingting. An OpenStack-Based Resource Optimization Scheduling Framework., Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), 2013 Sixth International Symposium on. Vol. 1. IEEE, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/iscid.2013.72

Google Scholar

[7] Shaoka Zhao, Liyao Li, Jiahai Yang, et al. Deployment and Performance Evaluation of Virtual Network based on OpenStack., (2013).

DOI: 10.2991/ccis-13.2013.5

Google Scholar

[8] Stefan Brenner, Benjamin Garbers, and Rudiger Kapitza. Adaptive and Scalable High Availability for Infrastructure Clouds,. Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014: 16-30.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43352-2_2

Google Scholar

[9] OpenStack, OpenStack High Availability Guide, http: /docs. openstack. org/high-availability-guide/high-availability-guide. pdf, July (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4842-2125-9_5

Google Scholar

[10] Brent Salisbury, Updated DevStack OpenDaylight VM Image for OpenStack IceHouse, http: /networkstatic. net/updated-devstack-opendaylight-vm-image-for-openstack-ice house/, May (2014).

Google Scholar

[11] Scott Lowe, Using Logical Routing, http: /blog. scottlowe. org/2014/06/20/learning-nsx-part-14-using-logical-routing/, June (2014).

Google Scholar

[12] Neutron multihost, https: /docs. google. com/document/d/1Y41g-POd3DLmtFnD6JfKFDvZJikbUvsL0wIi8LFD35 U/edit#, (2014).

Google Scholar

[13] Neutron scheduler, https: /docs. google. com/document/d/1TJlW0_tMpeENA_ia38fvRu7ioKRt9fsWXBjivwd1mMw/edit, (2014).

Google Scholar

[14] Antonio Scarfò, and Maticmind SpA. The evolution of Data Center networking technologies., Data Compression, Communications and Processing (CCP), 2011 First International Conference on. IEEE, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/ccp.2011.30

Google Scholar

[15] Casimer DeCusatis. Optical networking in smarter data centers: 2015 and beyond., Optical Fiber Communication Conference. Optical Society of America, (2012).

DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2012.otu1g.7

Google Scholar

[16] Netperf, http: /www. netperf. org/netperf/, (2014).

Google Scholar