Compensation Incentive of CEO and Internal Capital Market Allocation Efficiency

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the agency theory of internal capital market, the compensation incentive of Headquarters is discussed as a key factor to the efficiency of internal capital market, using KKT. Assumed that equity incentive and investment incentive are Headquarters’ compensation body, investments in divisions are decided by the comparison between equity incentive and investment incentive, the comparison results in internal capital market “Socialism”. Furthermore, for the maximum of equity incentive and investment incentive, Headquarters prefers to overinvestment in divisions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4433-4437

Citation:

Online since:

November 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Robert H. Gertner, David S. Scharfstein, Jeremy C. Stein. Internal versus external capital markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1994, 109(4): 1211-1230.

DOI: 10.2307/2118361

Google Scholar

[2] J.C. Stein. Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance 1997. 52(1): 111-133.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03810.x

Google Scholar

[3] Vojislav Maksimovic, Gordon Phillips. Conglomerate firms and internal capital markets. Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance 2007. 1(8): 423-480.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53265-7.50022-6

Google Scholar

[4] C. J. Hadlock, M. Ryngaert, et al. Corporate Structure and Equity Offerings: Are There Benefits to Diversification? The Journal of Business 2001 . 74(4): 613-635.

DOI: 10.1086/321940

Google Scholar

[5] J.G. Matsusaka, V. Nanda. Internal capital markets and corporate refocusing. Journal of Financial Intermediation. 2002(11): 176-211.

DOI: 10.1006/jfin.2001.0333

Google Scholar

[6] D. Scharfstein, J. and Stein, The dark side of the internal capital markets: divisional rent seeking and inefficient investments. Journal of Finance, 2000, 55(6): 2537-2564.

DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00299

Google Scholar

[7] Julie Wulf, Internal Capital Markets and Firm-Level Compensation Incentives for Division Managers, Journal of Labor Economics, 2002, 20(4): 219-262.

DOI: 10.1086/338713

Google Scholar

[8] H. Shin, R. Stulz, Are internal capital markets efficient. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998(5): 531-552.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Rajan, H. Servaes, et al. The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment. The Journal of Finance, 2000, 55(1): 35-80.

DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00200

Google Scholar

[10] P. Bolton, D.S. Scharfstein. Corporate finance, the theory of the firm, and organizations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1998, 12(4): 95-114.

DOI: 10.1257/jep.12.4.95

Google Scholar

[11] Antonio E. Bernardo, Jiang Luo, James J.D. Wang. A theory of socialistic internal capital markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 80(1): 485-509.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.07.002

Google Scholar

[12] D. Hoang, M. Ruckes. Informed Headquarters and Socialistic Internal Capital Markets. 2008, Working paper.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1296643

Google Scholar

[13] Eric Szu-Wen Chou, Can socialism in internal capital markets occur in the absence of managerial rent seeking. Applied Economics, 2010, 42(1): 107-120.

DOI: 10.1080/00036840701579150

Google Scholar

[14] S. Johnson, R. La Porta, et al. Tunneling. American Economic Review, 2000, 90(2): 22-27.

Google Scholar

[15] Kee-Hong Bae et al, Tunneling or Value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups. The Journal of Finance, 2002. 6(12): 2695-2740.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00510

Google Scholar

[16] M. Z Yang, Internal Capital Market, Company Performance and Private Benefits of Control--Analyzed from the sample of Huatong Tianxiang Group. Account studies, 2006, 27(12): 61-67.

Google Scholar