Research on Quantitative Methods of Supply Chain Based on Disruptions Management Framework

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the development of supply chain businesses and natural disasters, the probability of risk of supply chain disruption is increasing and this kind of risk can bring huge losses to the enterprises. In this paper, disruption management strategy is an effective and necessary part of the supply chain disruption risk in supply chain management research, which is a new bright spot in the field. The new management ideas and sophisticated quantitative analysis results continue to emerge, but they are overall relatively fragmented, lack of system. So supply chain disruption research related to risk management is still in its infancy. Through the theories and methods of management science of quantitative supply chain integration and management, optimal configuration of the entire resources and benefit maximization of the whole supply chain can be achieved. The paper reviewed foreign research on quantitative integration of supply chain management, and proposed a comparative analysis, finally provided some possible future research directions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4882-4885

Citation:

Online since:

November 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Knemeyer, A.M., Zinn, W., Eroglu, C Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 2009, 27(2): 141-153.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.002

Google Scholar

[2] Yu, H. S., Zeng A.Z., Zhao, L.D. Single ordeal sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks. The International Journal of Management Science, 2009, 37: 788-800.

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2008.05.006

Google Scholar

[3] Chen. K. B. Xiao. T. J. Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer. European Journal of Operational Research. 2009. 197: 225-234.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.006

Google Scholar

[4] Scott C. Ellis. Raymond M. Henry. Jeff Shockley. Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment. Journal of Operations Management. 2010 (28) 34-46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.07.002

Google Scholar

[5] Jing Hou. Amy Z. Zeng. Lin du Zhao. Coordination with a backup buy-back supplier through contract under supply disruption. Transportation Research Part E. 2010 (46): 881-895.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.03.004

Google Scholar