Verification of Tin Car Body Production by Unconventional Stamping Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The contribution deals with verification of tin car body production using single action experimental stamping die. Two methods of car body production were verified - the first one used open die made of tool steel and the second one used closed die made of tool steel with Fibroflex at the bottom of the die. The tin steel sheet TS 245 with thickness 0.28 mm had been used for the car body production. The shapes of pressings were evaluated using the photogrammetric 3D measuring system ARGUS. The ARGUS optical system allowed evaluating the wall thickness change and the deformation on the surface of pressings as well. These values had been compared for both method of the tin car body production.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

364-369

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Pollák, Forming dies for stamping - products of mechanical engineering industry, Proceedings TOOLS 2004, (2004) pp.24-27, ISBN 80-227-2043-7.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Spišák, E. Evin, J. Hudák, Forming technology. TU Košice, 1992, ISBN 80-7099-173-9.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Tišnovský, L. Mádle, Deep drawing on presses, first ed., SNTL, Praha, 1990, ISBN 80-03-00221-4.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Trzepieciński, Advances in sheet metal forming technologies, Zeszyty naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, Nr 284, Mechanika z. 84 (2012), pp.59-70, ISSN 0209-2689.

DOI: 10.7862/rm.2012.12

Google Scholar

[5] L. Pollák, Anisotropy and drawability of steel sheets, first ed., Alfa, Bratislava, (1978).

Google Scholar

[6] W. Frącz, F. Stachowicz, T. Pieja, Aspects of verification and optimization of sheet metal numerical simulations process using the photogrammetric system, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, Vol. 19 No. 1 (2013) pp.51-59, ISSN 1338-1156.

DOI: 10.12776/ams.v19i1.86

Google Scholar

[7] J. Slota, M. Jurčišin, I. Gajdoš, E. Spišák, The sensitivity of a photogramm. meth. in formab. anal., Acta Mechanica et Automatica, Vol. 7 No. 2 (2013) pp.117-123, ISSN 1898-4088.

DOI: 10.2478/ama-2013-0021

Google Scholar

[8] Project Steelpark. Information on http: /www. sjf. tuke. sk/ktam/Steelpark/index. htm.

Google Scholar

[9] ARGUS v6. 2 User manual, GOM mbH, Braunschweig, Germany, (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] L. Štefaňák, Numerical simulation of tin car-body production, Graduation theses, Dept. of Technol. and Mat., Faculty of Mech. Eng., Technical University in Košice, (2014).

Google Scholar