Improved Power Performance of Activated Carbon Anode by Fe₂O₃ Addition in Microbial Fuel Cells

Abstract:

Poor energy output and high cost are the key factors to inhibit the development and application of microbial fuel cells (MFCs). Different types of modification techniques for anode material are suggested to improve power performance in MFCs. nanoFe₂O₃ is characteristics of no toxicity, biocompatibility and low cost. In this work, stainless steel mesh (SSM), ultracapacitor activated carbon with SSM (AcM), Fe₂O₃ added AcM (AMF) anodes are investigated to improve MFCs performance. The highest maximum power density (806 ± 26 mW·m^-2) is obtained in AMF anode, which is 11 % higher than that of AcM (730 ± 27 mW·m^-2), and 57 folds higher than that of SSM anode (12 ± 0.7 mW·m^-2). The semi-conducting properties of passive film on the anode surface play a rather important role in anodic reaction by Mott-Schottky analysis. Tafel test demonstrates that the exchange current density (8.36×10^-4 A·m^-2) is improved by 20 % for AMF compared with AcM control (6.93×10^-4 A·m^-2). These results show AcM is suitable as MFCs anode, and further addition of Fe₂O₃ can increase the extracellular electron transfer in that way increase power production in MFCs.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 700)
• Pages: 170-174
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.700.170
• Online since: December 2014
• Authors: Xin Hong Peng, Xi Zhang Chu*, Peng Fei Huang, Ke Shan
• Keywords: Activated Carbon, Fe₂O₃ Addition, Microbial Fuel Cell, Power Generation

References

[1] B.E. Logan, K. Rabaey, Science, Vol. 337 (2012), p.686.

[2] R.A. Rozendal, E. Leone, J. Keller, K. Rabaey, Electrochemistry Communications, Vol. 11 (2009), p.1752.

[3] S. Chen, G. Liu, R. Zhang, B. Qin, Y. Luo, Environmental science & technology, Vol. 46 (2012), p.2467.

[4] Z. Lv, D. Xie, X. Yue, C. Feng, C. Wei, Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 210 (2012), p.26.

[5] Z. Wen, S. Ci, S. Mao, S. Cui, G. Lu, K. Yu, S. Luo, Z. He, J. Chen, Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 234 (2013), p.100.

[6] A. Okamoto, K. Hashimoto, R. Nakamura, Bioelectrochemistry, Vol. 85 (2012), p.61.

[7] R. Nakamura, F. Kai, A. Okamoto, G.J. Newton, K. Hashimoto, Angewandte Chemie Internation Edition, Vol. 48 (2009), p.508.

[8] D.A. Lowy, L.M. Tender, J.G. Zeikus, D.H. Park, D.R. Lovley, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Vol. 21 (2006) (2058).

DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2006.01.033

[9] X. Peng, H. Yu, X. Wang, Q. Zhou, S. Zhang, L. Geng, J. Sun, Z. Cai, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 121 (2012), p.450.

[10] J.Y. Ji, Y.J. Jia, W.G. Wu, L.L. Bai, L.Q. Ge, Z.Z. Gu, Colloid Surface A, 390 (2011) 56.

[11] H. Ni, Y. Ni, Y. Zhou, J. Hong, Materials Letters, Vol. 73 (2012), p.206.

[12] X. Peng, H. Yu, L. Ai, N. Li. and Wang X. Bioresource technology, Vol. 144 (2013), p.689.

[13] S. Cheng, H. Liu, B.E. Logan, Electrochemistry Communications, Vol. 8 (2006), p.489.

[14] X. Wang, S.A. Cheng, Y.J. Feng, M.D. Merrill, T. Saito, B.E. Logan, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43 (2009), p.6870.