Dissolution of 238U from Low-Level Contaminated Soil by Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans

Article Preview

Abstract:

Dissolution behavior of 238U from low-level contaminated soil was investigated by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (A. ferrooxidans) . It was found that the removal rate of 238U by A. ferrooxidans was much higher than that of deionized water. The A. ferrooxidans can promote the dissolution of 238U and the removal rate can achieve 94.50 %. Furthermore, the turnover rate of soil nutrients of A. ferrooxidans treated sample was much lower than that of dissolution by deionized water, and the soil fertility was maintained. This work illustrated the efficacy of leaching of uranium by the involvement of bacteria by indirect mechanism.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

225-229

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Gavrilescu, L.V. Pavel, I. Cretescu. Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials 163 (2009) 475–510.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.103

Google Scholar

[2] B.A. Napier, P.R. Reed, Alternative Conceptual Models for Assessing Food Chain Pathways in Biosphere Models, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington, DC, (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] Groudeva V I, Vasilev D V, Karavaiko G I, et al. Changes in an Ore Dump During a 40-Year Period of Commercial-Scale and Spontaneous Natural Bioleaching[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2009, 71: 373-376.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.71-73.373

Google Scholar

[4] Groudev S N, Spasova I I, Georgiev P S. In situ bioremediation of soils contaminated with radioactive elements and toxic heavy metals[J]. International journal of mineral processing, 2001, 62(1): 301-308.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-7516(00)00061-2

Google Scholar

[5] Tikilili P V, Nkhalambayausi-Chirwa E M. Characterization and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in radioactive wastewater[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2011, 192(3): 1589-1596.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.079

Google Scholar

[6] Tate R L, Klein D A. Soil Reclamation Processes Microbiological Analyses and Applications[M]. CRC Press, (1985).

Google Scholar

[7] Lloyd J R. Microbial reduction of metals and radionuclides[J]. FEMS microbiology reviews, 2003, 27(2‐3): 411-425.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00044-5

Google Scholar

[8] McLean R J C, Fortin D, Brown D A. Microbial metal-binding mechanisms and their relation to nuclear waste disposal[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1996, 42(4): 392-400.

DOI: 10.1139/m96-055

Google Scholar

[9] Anderson R T, Lovley D R. Microbial redox interactions with uranium: an environmental perspective[J]. Interactions of microorganisms with radionuclides. Elsevier Science Limited, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002: 205-223.

DOI: 10.1016/s1569-4860(02)80036-5

Google Scholar

[10] Lin Ying, Gao Bai, Li Yuanfeng. Low concentration of uranium nuclear industry wastewater treatment technology progress[J]. Shandong chemical industry, 2009, 38(3): 35-38.

Google Scholar

[11] Handbook of groundwater remediation using permeable reactive barriers: applications to radionuclides, trace metals, and nutrients[M]. Academic Press, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-012513563-4/50005-0

Google Scholar

[12] Shen Lei, Zhang Taiping, Jia Xiaoshan. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University: Natural Science, 2005, 44(2): 111~115.

Google Scholar

[13] Yang Yu, Zhang Yanfei, Huang Jufang, Jang Donghai. The preservation methods of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans[J]. Journal of central south university (natural science edition). 2006(06).

Google Scholar

[14] Soil Science Society of China Agricultural Chemistry Committees. Conventional methods of soil agricultural chemistry, Beijing: Science Press, (1983).

Google Scholar

[15] Alberts J J, Muller R N. The distribution of 239, 240Pu, 238Pu, and 137Cs in various particle size classes of Lake Michigan sediments. J Environ Qual, 1979, 8(1): 20~22.

DOI: 10.2134/jeq1979.00472425000800010005x

Google Scholar

[16] The state environmental protection standards. Intends to open the site acceptable levels of residual radioactivity in soil (provisional, HJ53-2000). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, (2000).

Google Scholar

[17] YangYuee, Gu Zhijie, Wang Zhiming. U.S. radioactive contaminated sites remediation cleaning levels in the soil[J]. Radiation protection communication, 2007, 27(2): 8~12.

Google Scholar

[18] Zhang Lanlan, Zou Ping, Wei Yunlin, Zhang Wenbin. A strain of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans system evolution analysis as well as the effect of leaching mining research[J]. Mining and Engineering 2008(08).

Google Scholar

[19] Gavrilescu M, Pavel L V, Cretescu I. Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 163(2): 475-510.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.103

Google Scholar

[20] Bihari Á, Dezső Z. Examination of the effect of particle size on the radionuclide content of soils[J]. Journal of environmental radioactivity, 2008, 99(7): 1083-1089.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.12.020

Google Scholar