Study of the Milling Process for Thin Components Using a Flexible Setup Configuration

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the aerospace industry, numerous large parts with complex curvatures and several thin wall/web pockets are required to ensure stiffness and low weight for aircraft structures. Costly processes and dedicated setups are usually required to machine such thin plate components. Therefore, investigating new machining methods involving flexible setups for such parts is an interesting avenue for cost savings, but a big challenge as well, due to a lack of support and part flexibility. In fact, a flexible setup is a tooling system with several adjustable positioning supports, which can easily adapt to different workpiece geometries. In this paper, an experimental investigation of the machining of pockets for thin components using flexible setup is presented. A design of experiments is proposed to verify the ability of pocket machining for thin plates of aluminum 2024-T3 in terms of quality. During the machining tests, the cutting forces were measured using a Kistler dynamometer table, while the displacement of the plates, for the flexible setup configuration, was measured using a Keyence displacement sensor. The force and displacement signals were analyzed and a fine correlation proposed between them and the resulting quality of the part, expressed in terms of profile and size errors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

27-31

Citation:

Online since:

December 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W. F. Lowell (1982), Geo-metrics II: Dimensioning and Tolerancing, ANSI/ASME Standard, Y13. 5M, 35-52.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Cai, S. J. Hu, J. X. Yuan (1996), Deformable Sheet Metal Fixturing: Principles, Algorithms, and Simulations, Jounal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 118(3), 318-324.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2831031

Google Scholar

[3] D. F. Walczyk, R. S. Longtin, (2000), Fixturing of Compliant Parts Using a Matrix of Reconfigurable Pins, Jounal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 122(4), 766-772.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1314599

Google Scholar

[4] T. Aoyama1, Y. Kakinumal (2005), Development of Fixture Devices for Thin and Compliant Workpieces, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 54(1), 325-328.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60114-0

Google Scholar

[5] H. Asada, A. By (1985), Kinematic Analysis of Workpart Fixturing for Flexible Assembly with Automatically Reconfigurable Fixtures, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, Vol. 1(2), 86-94.

DOI: 10.1109/jra.1985.1087007

Google Scholar

[6] K. Youcef-Toumi, W. S. Liu, H. Asada (1988), Computer-Aided Analysis of Reconfigurable Fixtures and Sheet Metal Parts for Robotic Drilling, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 4(3-4), 387-393.

DOI: 10.1016/0736-5845(88)90009-9

Google Scholar

[7] A. Fields, K. Youcef-Toumi, H. Asada, (1989), Flexible fixturing and automatic drilling of sheet metal parts using a robot manipulator, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 5(4), 371-380.

DOI: 10.1016/0736-5845(89)90010-0

Google Scholar

[8] AYC. Nee, A. S. Kumar, S. Prombanpong, K. Y. Puah (1992), A Feature-based Classification Scheme for Fixtures, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 41(1), 189-193.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61182-2

Google Scholar

[9] M. V. Gandhi, B. S. Thompson (1986), Automated Design of Modular Fixtures for Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 5(4), 243-252.

DOI: 10.1016/0278-6125(86)90055-5

Google Scholar