Study of Transverse Section Temperature Distribution in Underground Coal Gasification

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order for current laboratory studies of strata performances under high temperature to be applied in Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) technology, the temperature scope (range) of UCG must be studied. Based on the heat conduction differential equation, this paper simulates the transverse section temperature distribution of UCG in the multi-physics coupling field. It demonstrates that the strata properties at a range of two meters are affected by high temperature, and the influence on sandstone is more obvious than that of coal. The temperature curves show a trend of linear to nonlinear as time goes. This paper presents the precedent of using multi-field coupling calculation to simulate UCG.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2513-2517

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[10] , 11].

Google Scholar

[12] Boundary Settings. The gasification channel boundaries are defined as temperature boundaries, the temperature of which is 1400K. This model does not consider the heat effects of bottom strata, thus the bottom boundaries of the model are defined as thermal insulation. Suppose the model region is big enough, which means that the surrounding boundaries are not influenced by the gasification temperature field. Therefore, they are also temperature boundaries with ambient temperature. Left and right boundaries of the structural mechanics model are stated as fixed boundaries. Top, bottom and interior boundaries are considered as free boundaries. There is a 2. 47e7N/m2 uniform load applied on the top boundary, which is equivalent as the burial depth is 1000m. Likewise, there is also a uniform load valued as 2. 5e7 N/m2 acted on the bottom boundary. Results and Analysis This paper mainly studies the heat conductive process at the transverse section during UCG. Fig. 3 represents the temperature distribution on the center vertical direction of the gasification transverse section as the burning time is 6 days. It shows that heat conducts to overlying strata linearly at the beginning. The temperature rising speed decreases over time, which means the nonlinear character becomes more and more obvious as time passes. The heat radius is 3 meters when burning 6days. Fig. 3 Temperature distribution on center vertical direction of gasification Fig. 4 Temperature distribution on horizontal direction of the roof of coal seam Fig. 4 gives the horizontal temperature distribution of the coal seam roof. It shows that the conduction regulation is similar compared with vertical conduction. The influence range is only 2m, which is lesser than the vertical conduction. In conclusion, heat conduction presents a linear to nonlinear pattern as time passes. The reason for this may be the influence weights of convection term and diffusion term change as time elapses. When time is limited, the convection term, which is the first-order item, plays a leading role in heat transfer. However, with the extension of time, the contribution of the diffusion term, which is second-order, becomes bigger and bigger. Consequently, the curves showed nonlinearity. The chemical reactions of coal occur only when the temperature is higher than 300℃. There are just physical changes, such as water desorption or coal shrinkage, happened when temperature is lower than 100℃.

Google Scholar

[13] The performance of sandstone does not change a lot before the temperature reaches 200℃, either [2, 3]. Accordingly, it is known that performances of overlying strata change only when the temperature is higher than 400K. Thus, stratum properties are only affected in a small area during UCG. The temperature field influences 1-2 meters in this model. Conclusions This simulation has built a two-dimensional coupled heat conduction and structural mechanics model to investigate the transverse section temperature distribution during UCG. Based on general heat transfer partial differential equation, the temperature change curves on horizontal and vertical directions have been given. Calculation and analysis indicate that only a 2 meter range of strata is affected by heat. Based on the study in this paper, current experimental studies of rock performance at elevated temperature could be utilized in UCG. This paper also puts forward a new method, multi-physics field coupling analysis, of numerical simulation. The UCG process could be reflected more accurately and vividly using this method. Future work may be carried out in the following aspects: 1. Optimize the transient analysis model by considering the variation of temperature field as time changes. 2. Simulate the temperature field distribution during UCG in three-dimensional model. 3. Couple the heat transfer, structural mechanics and chemical engineering modulus, to simulate a more authentic gasification process. Nomenclature k=Thermal Conductivity ρ=Density Cp=Heat capacity at constant pressure E=elastic modulus ν=Poisson's ratio References.

Google Scholar

[1] Feng Yu: Structural mechanics simulation in UCG, Mining industry renditions. 2(1992) 1-2.

Google Scholar

[2] Lunjian Chen, Zhong Wu, Bendong Qin and Haitao Gu: Mechanical characteristics and cracking mechanism of coal roof sandstone under high temperature, Journal of Chongqing University. 28(2005) 123-126.

Google Scholar

[3] Hongbao Zhao, Guangzhi Yin and Xiaoshuang Li: Experimental study of characteristics of tensile burned gritstone, Rock and Soil Mechanics. 31(2010) 1143-1146.

Google Scholar

[4] Greg Perkins and Veena Sahajwalla: A Numerical Study of the Effects of Operating Conditions and Coal Properties on Cavity Growth in Underground Coal Gasification, Energy&Fuels. 20(2006) 596-608.

DOI: 10.1021/ef050242q

Google Scholar

[5] D.E. Stephenson, S.T. Dass and D.E. Shau: Numerical modeling of subsidence induced by underground coal gasification, including thermal effects, In Situa; (United States). 7: 1(1983) 27-51.

Google Scholar

[6] B.C. Trent and R.T. Langland: Subsidence modeling for underground coal gasification, In Situ: (United States). 7: 1(1983) 53-58.

Google Scholar

[7] M.H.H. Hettema, K-H.A.A. Wolf and C.J. De Pater: The Influence of Steam Pressure on Thermal Spalling of Sedimentary Rock: Theory and Experiments, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 35(1998) 3-15.

DOI: 10.1016/s0148-9062(97)00318-5

Google Scholar

[8] Danren Peng, Quanfu Zhao, Lanwen Hu, Qinfu Wang and Benjun He: Heat conductivity studies of coal and rock, Mining Safety and Environmental Protection. 27(2000) 16-18.

Google Scholar

[9] Lanhe Yang, Jie Liang and Li Yu: Industrial experiment of UCG[J], Journal of China University of Mining&Technology. 27(1998) 254-257.

Google Scholar

[10] Lanhe Yang: Multi-state mathematical model in Underground Coal Gasification, Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University. 35(2001) 1203-1207.

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. kawise. com/Coalchem/MeiTan/200704/20070414163919. shtml.

Google Scholar

[12] Youliang Zhang, in: The latest engineering geology manual, first ed., Chinese knowledge press, China, 2006, p.492.

Google Scholar

[13] Lanhe Yang, Quanyou Song, Yaojuan Li, in: UCG Engineering, first ed., China University of Mining&Technology press, China, 2001, p.17.

Google Scholar