Multimodal Pushover Analysis for R.C. Bridges

Abstract:

In recent years, Italian technical-scientific community has increased its interest on the evaluation of the seismic response of existing structures. Among this wide range of structures, reinforced concrete bridges stand out for their strategic relevance and technical complexity. Most of these structures were built between 60ies and 70ies, according to design procedures which ignored nowadays knowledge in seismic engineering. Thus, the necessity to evaluate the real strength capacity of these structures with modern analysis techniques has become essential, leading to the determination of their safety level in case of an earthquake. In particular, for the assessment of several bridges of a motorway network, a multi-modal pushover analysis approach has been considered. This analysis technique allows considering the nonlinear behaviour and the complex dynamic response of such structures without exceeding in high computational costs. Some basic rules were defined (constitutive laws of materials, finite element type, plastic hinge models, etc.) for the modelling of bridges, in order to guarantee homogeneous comparable results among different structures of a network. At the end, some of the results are compared to see the variation of the verification level with respect to both the number of modes considered and the analysis’s accuracy in terms of number of loading steps.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 725-726)
• Pages: 888-895
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.725-726.888
• Online since: January 2015
• Authors: Pietro Crespi*, Alberto Franchi, Nicola Giordano
• Keywords: Capacity Curve, Performance Point, Pushover Analysis, Reinforced Concrete Bridges, Seismic Evaluation

References

[1] ATC-40. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings (1996) Applied technology council, 8. 1-8. 66, Redwood City, CA.

[2] Fajfar, P. Capacity Spectrum Method Based on Inelastic Demand Spectra (1999) Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, pp.979-993.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::aid-eqe850>3.0.co;2-1

[3] Freeman, S.A. Prediction of Response of Cocrete Buildings to Severe Earthquake Motion (1978).

[4] Freeman, S.A. Review of the Development of the Capacity Spectrum Method (2004) ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, Paper No. 438, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp.1-13.

[5] Causevic, M., Mitrovic, S. Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions (2011) Bull. Earthquake Eng., Springer, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.467-489.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1

[6] FEMA 440. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures (2005) Federal Emergency Management Agency, 6. 1-6. 10, Washington, DC.

[7] Chopra, A. K., Goel, R. K. A modal pushover procedure to estimate seismic demands of buildings (2002) Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, pp.561-582.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.144

[8] Kappos, A.J., Paraskeva, T.S., Sextos, A.G. Extension of Modal Pushover Analysis to Seismic Assessment of Bridges (2006) Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, pp.1269-1293.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.582

[9] EN1998-2. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 2: Bridges (2005) CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels.

[10] NTC-08 Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (2008) Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Rome.

[11] Verderame, G. M., Stella, A., Cosenza, E. Le proprietà meccaniche degli acciai impiegati nelle strutture in cemento armato realizzate negli anni 60 (2001) X Convegno Nazionale "L'Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, Potenza e Matera, 9-13/09/(2001).

[12] EN1998-3. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (2005) CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels.