Review of Research Progresses in Unsteady Aerodynamic Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the analysis of the flight stability, the research progress of the unsteady aerodynamic model was comprehensively introduced. Bryan, first of all, the aerodynamic load of traditional dynamic derivative model is put forward, still used today in some engineering issues. However, Bryan state parameters of the model is not complete, not exactly reflect the unsteady aerodynamic force time history effect and nonlinear effect. Etkin models, by retaining the item of high order Taylor expansion, including the influence of nonlinear effect. Improved Etkin model can explain the actual flight of some of the common transient response, including due to stall the mutation and aerodynamic force/torque caused by unsteady flow dynamic bifurcation and chaos of the aerodynamic force/torque value and uncertain phenomenon. Finally, the unsteady flow field of a reduced order model development trends and application prospect were analyzed, and pointing out that the CFD simulation is still accurately predict the plane stability and handling the most important method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

101-107

Citation:

Online since:

January 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Liu Wei. NonlinearDynamicsAnalysisofrMechanism of slender WIng Rock and study of Numerical Simulation Method [D]. Changsha, 2004. (in China).

Google Scholar

[2] Yang Xiaoliang. Aircraft multi degree of freedom coupling rock movement numerical simulation research [D]. Changsha, 2012. (in China).

Google Scholar

[3] Chambers JR, Hall RM. Historical review of uncommanded lateral-directional motions at transonic conditions [J]. Journal of aircraft, 2004, 41 (3): 436-47.

DOI: 10.2514/1.4470

Google Scholar

[4] Woodson SH, Green BE, Chung JJ, et al. Understanding Abrupt Wing Stall with Computational Fluid Dynamics [J]. Journal of aircraft, 2005, 42 (3): 578-85.

DOI: 10.2514/1.2730

Google Scholar

[5] Forsythe JR, Fremaux CM, Hall RM. Calculation of static and dynamic stability derivatives of the F/A-18E in abrupt wing stall using RANS and DES [M]. Computational Fluid Dynamics 2004. Springer. 2006: 537-42.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31801-1_76

Google Scholar

[6] YANG Xiaoliang,LIU Wei,WU Tianzuo, et al. Coupling mechanism analysis of a slender delta wing in combined free-roll and free-sideslip motion [J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2014, 32 (1): 1-7. (in China).

Google Scholar

[7] Bryan G. Stability in Aviation: an Introduction to Dynamical Stability as Applied to the Motions of Aeroplanes [J]. Nature, 1912, 88.

Google Scholar

[8] Boyd T. ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF GH BRYAN'S STABILITY IN AVIATION [J]. Journal of Aeronautical History Paper No, 2011, 4.

Google Scholar

[9] Bryan G, Williams W. The longitudinal stability of aerial gliders [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1904, 73 (488-496): 100-16.

DOI: 10.1098/rspl.1904.0017

Google Scholar

[10] Greenwell DI. Frequency effects on dynamic stability derivatives obtained from small-amplitude oscillatory testing [J]. Journal of aircraft, 1998, 35 (5): 776-83.

DOI: 10.2514/2.2369

Google Scholar

[11] Vukelich S, Williams J: AFFDL-TR-79-3032. April, (1979).

Google Scholar

[12] Bolster C. Effect of Slipstream on the Longitudinal Stability of a Low Wing Monoplane [J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences (Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences), 2012, 4 (10).

DOI: 10.2514/8.452

Google Scholar

[13] Etkin B. Dynamics of atmospheric flight [M]. Courier Dover Publications, (2012).

Google Scholar

[14] Wang Z-H, Shi Z-W. State-space representation of lateral-directional unsteady Aerodynamic model at high angle of attack [J]. Flight Dynamics, 2010, 28 (6): 16-20. (in China).

Google Scholar

[15] Etkin B: DTIC Document, (1972).

Google Scholar

[16] Etkin B, Reid L. Dynamics of flight: stability and control [M]. Wiley. (1996).

Google Scholar

[17] Klein V, Morelli EA. Aircraft system identification: theory and practice [M]. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Reston, VA, USA, (2006).

Google Scholar

[18] Cowley WL, Glauert H. The effect of the lag of the downwash on the longitudinal stability of an aeroplane and on the rotary derivative Mq [M]. HM Stationery Office, (1921).

Google Scholar

[19] Tobak M. On the use of the indicial-function concept in the analysis of unsteady motions of wings and wing-tail combinations [J]. (1954).

Google Scholar

[20] Tobak M, Schiff LB. On the formulation of the aerodynamic characteristics in aircraft dynamics [J]. (1976).

Google Scholar

[21] Tobak M, Schiff L. Aerodynamic mathematical modeling-basic concepts [J]. AGARD Lecture Series, 1981, (114).

Google Scholar

[22] Tobak M, Schiff LB. The role of time-history effects in the formulation of the aerodynamics of aircraft dynamics [J]. Dynamic Stability Parameters, 1978, 235 26. 1-. 10.

Google Scholar

[23] Volterra V. Theory of functionals and of integral and integro-differential equations [M]. DoverPublications. com, (2005).

Google Scholar

[24] Lomax H, Heaslet MA, Fuller FB, et al. Two-and three-dimensional unsteady lift problems in high-speed flight [M]. US Government Printing Office, (1952).

Google Scholar

[25] Ruo SY, Myers MK. Calculation of unsteady aerodynamic coefficient using transonic time domain methods [J]. A83-29833, (1983).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1983-885

Google Scholar

[26] Leishman J. Subsonic unsteady aerodynamics caused by gusts using the indicial method [J]. Journal of aircraft, 1996, 33 (5): 869-79.

DOI: 10.2514/3.47029

Google Scholar

[27] Parameswaran V, Baeder JD. Indicial aerodynamics in compressible flow-direct computational fluid dynamic calculations [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1997, 34 (1): 131-3.

DOI: 10.2514/2.2146

Google Scholar

[28] Sitaraman J, Baeder JD. Computational-fluid-dynamics-based enhanced indicial aerodynamic models [J]. Journal of aircraft, 2004, 41 (4): 798-810.

DOI: 10.2514/1.12419

Google Scholar

[29] Lesieutre DJ, Reisenthel PH, Dillenius MF. A practical approach for calculating aerodynamic indicial functions with a Navier-Stokes solver [J]. AIAA paper, 1994, (94-0059).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1994-59

Google Scholar

[30] Tobak M, Chapman GT, Schiff LB. MATHEMATICAL MO0ELING OF THE AEROOYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS IN FLIGHT 0YNAMICS; proceedings of the Proceedings of the Berkeley-Ames Conference on Nonlinear Problems in Control and Fluid Dynamics, F, 1984 [C]. Math Science Press.

Google Scholar

[31] Chapman GT, Tobak M. NONLINEAR PROBLEMS IN FLIGHT 0YNAMICS; proceedings of the Proceedings of the Berkeley-Ames Conference on Nonlinear Problems in Control and Fluid Dynamics, F, 1984 [C]. Math Science Press.

Google Scholar

[32] Reisenthel PH. Development of a nonlinear indicial model for maneuvering fighter aircraft [J]. AIAA paper, 1996, 896 (1996).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-896

Google Scholar