Effect of Hybrid Tackifiers on Viscosity, Peel Strength and Shear Resistance of Natural Rubber and Epoxidized Natural Rubber-Based Pressure Sensitive Adhesives

Article Preview

Abstract:

Natural rubber (SMR L grade), epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) 25 and 50 were loaded with hybrid tackifiers consisting of a mixture of coumarone-indene and gum rosin. The coumarone-indene was fixed at 40 parts per hundred of rubber (phr) while the concentration of gum rosin was varied from 20 to 80 phr. The viscosity, peel and shear strength of the adhesives prepared from the elastomers was studied. Results show that peel strength exhibits a maximum value at 60 phr gum rosin for SMR L-based adhesive while for ENR 25 and ENR 50 based adhesives a maximum value is observed at 40 phr gum rosin which was attributed to the occurrence of optimum wettability and compatibility at this tackifier loading. Meanwhile, viscosity and shear strength decreases with increasing gum rosin concentration. SMR L-based adhesive consistently exhibits higher viscosity and shear strength whereas ENR 25-based adhesive steadily shows higher value for all modes of peel tests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

49-53

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Benedek, I., Developments in pressure-sensitive products. 2010: CRC Press.

Google Scholar

[2] Poh, B. and C. Chee, Effect of coumarone-indene resin on adhesion property of SMR 20-based pressure-sensitive adhesives. International Journal of Polymeric Materials, 2007. 56(3): pp.247-255.

DOI: 10.1080/00914030600812483

Google Scholar

[3] Poh, B., K. Yee, and H. Lim, Viscosity and shear strength of natural‐rubber‐based adhesives in the presence of gum rosin and petroresin. Journal of applied polymer science, 2008. 110(6): pp.4079-4083.

DOI: 10.1002/app.29012

Google Scholar

[4] Poh, B. and A. Yong, Effect of molecular weight of rubber on tack and peel strength of SMR L-based pressure-sensitive adhesives using gum rosin and petroresin as tackifiers. Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A, 2008. 46(1): pp.97-103.

DOI: 10.1080/10601320802515605

Google Scholar

[5] Poh, B. and C. Gan, Viscosity and peel strength of magnesium oxide-filled adhesive prepared from epoxidized natural rubber (ENR 25). Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2010. 49(2): pp.191-194.

DOI: 10.1080/03602550903284289

Google Scholar

[6] Khan, I. and B. Poh, The effect of silica on the peel adhesion of epoxidized natural rubber-based adhesive containing coumarone-indene resin. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2010. 49(13): pp.1356-1360.

DOI: 10.1080/03602559.2010.512321

Google Scholar

[7] Poh, B. and A. Yong, Effect of molecular weight of epoxidized‐natural rubber on viscosity and tack of pressure‐sensitive adhesives. Journal of applied polymer science, 2010. 115(2): pp.1120-1124.

DOI: 10.1002/app.31185

Google Scholar

[8] Poh, B. and W. Ng, Effect of zinc oxide concentration and testing rate on shear properties of Standard Malaysian Rubber (SMR) L-based pressure-sensitive adhesives. Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, 2013. 45(1): pp.95-103.

DOI: 10.1177/0095244312445524

Google Scholar

[9] Kumar Singh, A., et al., Effect of tackifier and crosslinkers on electron beam curable polyurethane pressure sensitive adhesive. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2012. 81(5): pp.547-552.

DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.01.017

Google Scholar

[10] Khan, I. and B. Poh, Effect of silica on viscosity, tack, and shear strength of epoxidized natural rubber‐based pressure‐sensitive adhesives in the presence of coumarone‐indene resin. Journal of applied polymer science, 2010. 118(6): pp.3439-3444.

DOI: 10.1002/app.32686

Google Scholar

[11] Hashim, A. and S. Ong, Application of epoxidized natural rubber (NR) in pressure sensitive adhesives (PSAs). Chemistry, Manufacture and Applications of Natural Rubber, 2014: p.353.

DOI: 10.1533/9780857096913.2.353

Google Scholar