An Innovative and Reliable Wireless Angular Accelerometer Made Directly on a Flexible Substrate without Moving Parts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Five novel ideas are proposed in this paper to integrate an active RFID tag with a thermal convection angular accelerometer on a flexible substrate, thus the new device becomes a wireless sensor. The first innovative idea is that this device is without any movable parts, so it is very reliable. The second new idea is that it is made on a flexible substrate, such as plastic or polyimide, the thermal conductivity of the flexible substrate is much lower than silicon, and thus it can save more power and very useful for mobile operation. The third new idea is to apply xenon gas in the chamber to conduct the heat instead of the traditional carbon dioxide, so no oxidation and performance degradation effects will be produced on the heater and thermal sensors. The fourth new idea is to integrate with an active RFID tag on the same substrate, thus the device becomes a more useful wireless angular acceleration sensor. The final new idea is to apply a hemispherical chamber instead of the conventional rectangular one. From the simulation results one can see it is a good idea to apply a non-floating type angular accelerometer with a hemispherical chamber, the sensitivity performance is the best (395K/(rad/sec2)), and the response speed (693μs) is also comparable to the traditional one by using a floating type with a rectangular chamber (593μs). In summary, from the considerations of reliability, cost and performance, the non-floating type angular accelerometer with hemispherical chamber is a better choice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1293-1297

Citation:

Online since:

May 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.M. Lin and C.H. Lin: International Conference on Computer, Networks and Communication Engineering, Beijing, China (2013), p.569.

Google Scholar

[2] F. Khoshnoud and C.W. de Silva: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine Vol. 15 (2012), p.14.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Garraud, A. Giani, P. Combette, B. Charlot, and M. Richard: Sensors and Actuators A: Physical Vol. 170 (2011), p.4.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2011.05.029

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Zhao, A.P. Brokaw, M.E. Rebeschini, A.M. Leung, G.P. Pucci and A. Dribinsky, U.S. Patent 6, 795, 752, B1. (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Zhao, A. Leung, M.E. Rebeschini, G.P. Pucci, A. Dribinsky and Y. Cai, U.S. Patent 7, 305, 881, B2. (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] A. Dribinsky, G.P. Pucci, Y. Cai, M. O'Brien, G.J. Varghese, Y. Zhao and Y.Y. Cai, U.S. Patent 7, 862, 229. (2011).

Google Scholar

[7] T.R. Hsu: In MEMS and Microsystems: Design and Manufacture (McGraw-Hill, Companies Inc., Boston, USA 2002).

Google Scholar

[8] B. Alain, R. Alain, V. Bernard and G. Alain, European Patent EP1, 550, 874. (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] F. Peluso, D. Castagnolo and C. Albanese: Microgravity Sci. Technol. Vol. 13 (2002), p.41.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Piazza and P. Stephanou: Micromechanical Thermo-Fluidic Single-Axis Yaw Rate Sensor (University of California Berkeley, USA 2002).

Google Scholar

[11] J. Bahari and A.M. Leung: J. Micromech. Microeng. Vol. 21 (2011), p.1.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Courteaud, N. Crespy, P. Combette, B. Sorli and A. Giani: Sens. Actuators A: Physical Vol. 147 (2008), p.75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2008.03.015

Google Scholar

[13] J. Dido, P. Loisel and A. Renault, U.S. Patent 7, 426, 862, B2. (2008).

Google Scholar

[14] K.M. Liao, R. Chen and B.C.S. Chou: Sensors and Actuators A: Physical Vol. 130-131 (2006), p.282.

Google Scholar

[15] L. Lin, R.T. Howe and A.P. Pisano: IEEE Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems Vol. 7 (1998), p.286.

Google Scholar

[16] L.C. Spangler and C.J. Kemp: Sensors and Actuators A: Physical Vol. 54 (1996), p.523.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Petropoulosa, A. Moschosa, S. Athineosa and G. Kaltsas: Procedia Engineering Vol. 25 (2011), p.643.

Google Scholar

[18] R. Dao, D.E. Morgan, H.H. Kries and D.M. Bachelder, U.S. Patent 5, 581, 034, (1996).

Google Scholar

[19] A.A. Rekik, F. Azaïs, N. Dumas, F. Mailly and P. Nouet: Journal of Electronic Testing Vol. 27 (2011), p.411.

Google Scholar

[20] S. Kobayashi, Y. Watanabe, S. Kanauchi, I. Nakagawa, E. Suganurna and M. Esashi: The 8th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, and Eurosensors IX, Stockholm, Sweden Vol. 2 (1995), p.554.

DOI: 10.1109/sensor.1995.721891

Google Scholar

[21] U.A. Dauderstadt, P.H.S. de Vries, R. Hiratsuka, J.G. Korvink, P.M. Sarro, H. Baltes and S. Middelhoek: Sensors and Actuators A: Physical Vol. 55 (1996), p.3.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(96)01241-1

Google Scholar

[22] U.A. Dauderstadt, P.M. Sarro and P.J. French: Solid State Sensors and Actuators Vol. 66 (2008), p.244.

Google Scholar

[23] X.B. Luo, Z.X. Li, Z.Y. Guo and Y.J. Yang: Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering Vol. 11 (2011), p.504.

Google Scholar