Examination on Influence Caused by Air Injection Manners Changing in Aerobic-Anaerobic Landfill Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, aerobic-anaerobic landfill method (AANM) is focused on as a new way to speed up landfill stabilization, inhibit landfill gas flux, and ameliorate on leachate quality. Numerical simulation model is developed to guide the air injection craftwork and study its effect on achieving above goals. On basis of work finished in last period (0~310 days), air was injected into Lysimeters A (Lys.A) at 0.5 m, and at 2.5 m in Lys.B with the same rate of 1 L/min. In Lys.C there is no air injected. In order to interview the influence by air injection manners changing, from 310 days till 360 days, air injection manners are changed from Mono-site into Double-site in Lys.A and in Lys. B it will be changed from bottom-site (2.5m) into middle-site (1.5m). In Lys.C there will be no changing. By interviewing the comparisons on simulated results in 50 days with and without air injection manners changing, it was found that air injection manners changing in Lys.A causes TOC discharging amount increase more than 6 times, but T-N and GHE resulted from landfill gas decrease 24.1% and 71 % respectively. Air injection manners changing in Lys.B resulted in discharged TOC and T-N increase 108.1 % and 53.5 % respectively, while T-N decreases 3.7 %. On basis of mechanism assumption, mathematical model was developed and according to the simulated results for 5 years, air injected at 2.5 m achieved improvements on stabilization of solid phase organic carbon and nitrogen for 34 % and 13 %, amelioration on leachate quality for 35 % and 62 % of TOC and T-N, and the restraint of GHE for 14 times compared with no air injection case.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

310-317

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D.A. Mitchell, O. F Von Meien, N. Krieger, (2003). Recent developments in modeling of solid-state fermentation: heat and mass transfer in bioreactors. Biochemical Engineering Journal 13, 137–147.

DOI: 10.1016/s1369-703x(02)00126-2

Google Scholar

[2] D.A. Mitchell, O.F. Von Meien, N. Krieger, (2004). A review of recent developments in modeling of microbial growth kinetics and intraparticle phenomena in solid-state fermentation. Biochemical Engineering Journal 17, 15–26.

DOI: 10.1016/s1369-703x(03)00120-7

Google Scholar

[3] D.A. Mitchell, D.M. Stuart, R.D. Tanner (1999) Solid-state fermentation—microbial growth kinetics, in: M.C. Flickinger, S.W. Drew (Eds. ), The Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis and Bioseparation.

DOI: 10.1002/0471250589.ebt199

Google Scholar

[4] Pohland, F.G. (1975) Accelerated solid waste stabilization and leachate treatment by leachate recycle through sanitary landfills. Progress in Water Technology, 7, 753–765.

Google Scholar

[5] Barlaz, M.A., Ham, R.K., and Schaefer, D.M. (1990) Methane production from municipal refuse: a review of enhancement techniques and microbial dynamics. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 19(6), 557–584.

DOI: 10.1080/10643389009388384

Google Scholar

[6] Stessela, R.I. and Murphy, R.J. (1992) A lysimeter study of the aerobic landfill. Waste Management & Research, 10, 485-503.

DOI: 10.1016/0734-242x(92)90089-4

Google Scholar

[7] Hudgins,M., Harper,S. (1999) Operational characteristics of two aerobic landfill systems. The Seventh International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Sardinia, 4 October. 5, 2407–2429.

Google Scholar

[8] Cossu, R., and Rossetti, D. (2003) Pilot scale experiences with sustainable landfilling based on the PAF conceptual model. Proceedings of the Ninth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Cagliari, 6–10 October.

Google Scholar

[9] Bilgili, M.S., Demir, A., and Ozkaya, B. (2006) Quality and quantity of leachate in aerobic pilot-scale landfills. Environmental Management, Vol. 38, No. 2, 189-196.

DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0179-1

Google Scholar