Asymmetric Cascaded DC Sources Multilevel Inverter with Less Active Switches and Simpler Control Strategy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Cascaded H-Bridge (CHB) multilevel inverter (MLI) is among the most preferred topology in solar PV systems. While traditional asymmetric CHB MLI is easy to achieve higher number of output voltage levels compared to traditional symmetric CHB MLI, charge balancing between the voltage sources remains a challenge for asymmetric CHB MLI. This drawback results in unsteady DC voltage levels due to unbalanced power drawn from each voltage sources. Besides that, in battery powered applications, unbalanced power drawn results in unequal discharged among the batteries. In this paper, an asymmetric half H-bridge (HHB) MLI topology is presented which is easy to modularize as for symmetric CHB MLI while maintaining the ease in charge balancing control. The performance of this proposed asymmetric HHB MLI with charge balance control has been evaluated using PSIM software.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

111-115

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D.M.K. Schofield, M.P. Foster and D.A. Stone, Low-cost solar emulator for evaluation of maximum power point tracking methods, in Electronic Letters, vol. 47, no. 3, February, (2011).

DOI: 10.1049/el.2010.2930

Google Scholar

[2] C. Alexandru and C. Pozna, Simulation of a dual-axis solar tracker for improving the performance of a photovoltaic panel, in Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, Part A: Journal of power and, energy, 2010, p. p. B210–5.

DOI: 10.1243/09576509jpe871

Google Scholar

[3] A. Hepbasli, and Z. Alsuhaibani, A key review on present status and future directions of solar energy studies and applications in Saudi Arabia, in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, no. 9, pp.5021-5050, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.052

Google Scholar

[4] K. C. Venkatachalam, J. Jerome and J. Karpagam, An experimental investigation on a multilevel inverter for solar energy applications, in Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 47, p. p.157–167, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.025

Google Scholar

[5] A. Nordvall, Multilevel inverter topology survey, M. S. Thesis, Department of Energy and Environment, Division of Electric Power Engineering, Chalmers University Of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] B. Kalinowski and G. Anders, A new look at component maintenance practices and their effect on customer, station and system reliability, in Electric Power Energy System, p. p.679–95, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.03.023

Google Scholar

[7] L. M. Tolbert, F. Z. Peng, and T. G. Habetler, Multilevel Converters for Large Electric Drives, in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 35, no. 1, p. pp.36-44, January/February (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/28.740843

Google Scholar

[8] M. R. Banaei and E. Salary, Asymmetric Cascaded Multi-level Inverter: A Solution to Obtain High Number of Voltage Levels, in Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, p. pp.316-325, (2013).

DOI: 10.5370/jeet.2013.8.2.316

Google Scholar

[9] C. C. Chan, Zheng Ming Zhao, C. Qian, and S. Meng, Comparisons of PWM and One-Cycle Control for Power Amplifier With Multilevel Converter, in Letters to the Editor, IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 49, no. 6, p. pp.1342-1344, December (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/tie.2002.804988

Google Scholar

[10] F. L. Luo, Investigation on best switching angles to obtain lowest THD for multilevel DC/AC inverters, in IEEE Conf. Industrial Electronics and Applications, Melbourne, Australia, 2013, p. pp.1814-1818.

DOI: 10.1109/iciea.2013.6566663

Google Scholar

[11] P. Hu, D, Jiang, Y. Zhou, Y. Liang, J. Guo and Z. Lin, Energy-balancing Control Strategy for Modular Multilevel Converters Under Submodule Fault Conditions, in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no. 9, p. pp.5021-5030, September (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2013.2284919

Google Scholar

[12] T. Hoevenaars and K. LeDoux, Interpreting IEEE STD 519 and meeting its harmonic limits in VFD applications, in Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference, 2003. Record of Conference Papers. IEEE Industry Applications Society 50th Annual, Houston, Texas, U.S.A., September 2003, p. pp.145-150.

DOI: 10.1109/pcicon.2003.1242609

Google Scholar