The Effects of Melt Compounding Method on the Ambient and In Vitro Mechanical Properties of EVA/MMT Nanocomposites

Article Preview

Abstract:

The in vitro biostability of ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) nanocomposite incorporating the organically modified montmorillonite (organo-MMT) was investgated as a new material for biomedical applications. The effects of compounding process and filler loadings on the ambient and in vitro (exposed in oxidizing condition, 37°C) mechanical properties were studied. We have observed that, the melt compounded EVA copolymer by internal mixer (Brabender plasticoder) achieved the highest ambient and in vitro mechanical properties at low nanofiller content (1wt% organo-MMT). In contrast, the melt compounded EVA copolymer by twin screw extruder achieved the highest ambient and in vitro mechanical properties at high nanofiller content (5wt% organo-MMT). We suggest that this was due to the capability of the twin screw extruder to provide greater shear force for the exfoliation and dispersion of the high content organo-MMT as compared to internal mixer (Brabender plasticoder). However, compounding by twin screw extruder caused more severe reduction in tensile toughness of the EVA containing 5 wt% organo-MMT, after this material was exposed to oxidative agent, 37°C. These studies show that the melt compounding method may bring significant effect to both the ambient and in vitro mechanical performance of the EVA nanocomposites, and hence further investigation towards optimization should be pursued.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

75-79

Citation:

Online since:

September 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] V.R. Sastri, Plastics in Medical Applications : Properties, Requirements and Applications, Elsevier, PA, USA (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] A.F. Osman, A.M. Alakrach, H. Kalo, W.N.W. Azmi, & F. Hashim. RSC Advances, (2015) 5(40), 31485-31495.

DOI: 10.1039/c4ra15116j

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Andriani, I.C. Morrow, E. Taran, G.A. Edwards, T.L. Schiller, A.F. Osman, & D, J. Martin, Acta Biomaterialia, (2013), 9, (9), 8308.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.05.021

Google Scholar

[4] A.F. Osman, G. Edwards, D. Martin, Advanced Materials Research, (2014) 911, 115-119.

Google Scholar

[5] A.F. Osman, K. Jack, G. Edwards, & D. Martin, Advanced Materials Research, (2014), 832, 27-32.

Google Scholar

[6] A.F. Osman, Y. Andriani, G. A. Edwards, T.L. Schiller, K. S. Jack, I. C. Morrow, P. J. Halley, D. J Martin, RSC Advances, (2012).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Thomas, & G. E. Zaikov (Eds. ). Polymer nanocomposite research advances. Nova Publishers Inc. New York, USA (2008) p.232.

Google Scholar

[8] S.S. Ray and M. Okamoto, Programme Polymer Science (2003), 1539-1641.

Google Scholar