Comparative Analysis of Shear Strength of Single-Lap Adhesive Joints after "Thermal Shock"

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents a comparative analysis of static shear strength of single-lap adhesive joints of 316L steel, before and after mechanical treatment with a coated abrasive tool. The research was of comparative nature and focused on adhesive joints subjected to variable thermal stress and adhesive joints not subjected to such shock. Adhesives based on epoxy resins were used. The results of static shear strength tests of single-lap adhesive joints for different variations of material preparing were analysed. The obtained results were analysed statistically and in compliance with relevant scientific standards. The scope of tests covered a relatively short fatigue cycle, i.e. 200 cycles in the range of temperatures between-40°C and +60°C. The main aim of the research was to determine the relation between joint strength and thermal fatigue. The paper presents conclusions resulting from the conducted research.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

224-231

Citation:

Online since:

September 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Godzimirski, Czynniki kształtujące wytrzymałość połączeń klejowych, Technologia i Automatyzacja Montażu, 4, (1994), 61-64.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Kuczmaszewski, Fundamentals of metal-metal adhesive joint design, Politechnika Lubelska, Oddział PAN w Lublinie, Lublin, (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] M.P. Kwiatkowski, M. Kłonica, J. Kuczmaszewski, S. Satoh, Comparative analysis of energetic properties of Ti6Al4V titanium and EN-AW-2017A(PA6) aluminum alloy surface layers for an adhesive bonding application, Ozone: Science & Engineering: The Journal of the International Ozone Association, 35 (2013).

DOI: 10.1080/01919512.2013.772436

Google Scholar

[4] M. Kłonica, J. Kuczmaszewski, S. Samborski, Effect of a notch on impact resistance of the epidian 57/Z1 epoxy material after thermal shock", submitted to: Solid State Phenomena.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.240.161

Google Scholar

[5] M. Kłonica, J. Kuczmaszewski, Badania porównawcze wytrzymałości na ścinanie klejowych połączeń zakładkowych stali 316L po szokach termicznych, Przetwórstwo tworzyw, 2 (2015) 37-42.

Google Scholar

[6] H.B. Eral, D.J.C. Mannetje, Contact angle hysteresis: a review of fundamentals and applications, Colloid and Polymer Science, 291 (2013) 247–260.

DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2796-6

Google Scholar

[7] M.S. Islam, L. Tong, P.J. Falzon, Influence of metal surface preparation on its surface profile, contact angle, surface energy and adhesion with glass fibre prepreg, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 51 (2014) 32-41.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.02.006

Google Scholar

[8] M. Żenkiewicz, Comparative study on the surface free energy of a solid calculated by different methods, Polymer Testing, 26 (2007) 14-19.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.08.005

Google Scholar

[9] M. Żenkiewicz, Methods for the calculation of surface free energy of solids, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 24 (2007) 137-145.

Google Scholar

[10] Material certificate 316L steel No. B11236A01.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Humienny (red. ), Specyfikacje Geometrii Wyrobów (GPS) – wykład dla uczelni technicznych, Oficyna wydawnicza PW, (2001).

Google Scholar

[12] M. Korzyński, Metodyka eksperymentu, Planowanie, realizacja i statystyczne opracowanie wyników eksperymentów technologicznych, Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne. Warszawa, (2006).

Google Scholar