Energy Analysis of Ethanol Steam Reforming Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell for Electrical Power Generation

Article Preview

Abstract:

As Thailand is importantly an agricultural country driving the bio-ethanol production from agricultural feedstock via fermentation process and a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) has been known as an attractive energy conversion device due to its high efficiency and fuel flexibility, SOFC fueled by ethanol for electrical power generation has been performed. Hydrogen-rich gas from ethanol steam reforming is used as fuel carrier converting to generate electrical energy in SOFC. This paper presents an energy analysis of integrated steam reformer and SOFC system to determine the suitable ethanol concentration giving the optimum SOFC electrical efficiency. In this study, the ethanol concentrations between 20 and 56 %wt corresponding to water-to-ethanol ratios from 10 to 2 were varied at a fixed feed flow rate of 1 g/s of ethanol solution for hydrogen production. The SOFC power efficiency increased although the amount of hydrogen and SOFC electrical power decreased with decreasing the ethanol concentration. However, for the first law analysis, the heat load of each unit was calculated and it can be concluded that the overall system efficiency increased with increasing the ethanol concentration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

100-104

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.M. Krochta: California Agriculture (2007), pp.9-11.

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http: /ethanolrfa. 3cdn. net/7338b667796f41665f_9qm6i630e. pdf.

Google Scholar

[3] G.A. Deluga, J.R. Salge, L.D. Schmidt, X.E. Verykios: Science Vol. 303 (2004), pp.993-997.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Tsiakaras and A. Demin: J. Power Sources. Vol. 102 (2001), pp.210-217.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Vasudeva, N. Mitra, P. Umasankar, S.C. Dhingra: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 21 (1996), pp.13-18.

Google Scholar

[6] G. Maggio, S. Freni, S. Cavallaro: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 16 (1991), pp.307-312.

Google Scholar

[7] N. Srisiriwat, A. Therdthianwong, S. Therdthianwong: Proc. of the 2nd Joint International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment, (2006), pp.11-115.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Srisiriwat and N. Srisiriwat: Proc. of the 2nd Thammasat University International Conferences on Chemical, Environmental and Energy Engineering (2009), pp.260-264.

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Casas, Luis E. Arteaga, M. Morales, E. Rosa, Luis M. Peralta and J. Dewulf: Chem. Eng. J. (2010), pp.1057-1066.

Google Scholar

[10] K.D. Panopoulos, L.E. Fryda, J. Karl, S. Poulou and E. Kakaras: J Power Sources Vol. 159 (2006), pp.570-585.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.024

Google Scholar

[11] D. Georgis, S.S. Jogwar, A.S. Almansoori and P. Daoutidis: Proc. 2011 American Control Conference, San Francisco (2011), pp.1518-1523.

DOI: 10.1109/acc.2011.5991513

Google Scholar

[12] N. Srisiriwat and C. Wutthithanyawat: Applied Mechanics and Materials. Vols. 446-447 (2014), pp.790-795.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.446-447.790

Google Scholar