Development of Indirect Adaptive Control for Underwater Vehicles Using Nonlinear Estimator of Disturbances

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, authors propose a new method of disturbance estimation that can be used for marine and air vehicles. As stability area for nonlinear systems is connected with performance of estimation, indirect measurement is proposed to estimate the error. The base for calculation is vehicle accelerations provided by navigation system. New algorithms were tested in simulation for which authors developed a block diagram of indirect adaptive control system that features independence of estimator from controller. Analysis of results showed that the error of the developed estimator in transient mode is 30-40% less than error of the linear estimator. In steady state mode, gain of the proposed estimator is equal to gain of the linear estimator and output noise is the same. Simulated system was implemented in mini motor boat, and showed good results in experiment. New estimator allowed to increase the accuracy of moving along the paths.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1028-1034

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Healey, Anthony J., Lienard, David. Multivariable sliding mode control for autonomous diving and steering of unmanned underwater vehicles, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol 18 (3), pp.327-339, (1993).

DOI: 10.1109/joe.1993.236372

Google Scholar

[2] D.J. Stilwell, B.E. Bishop, Platoons of underwater vehicles, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 20 (6), pp.45-52, (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] V. Kh. Pshikhopov, M. Y. Medvedev, and B. V. Gurenko, Homing and Docking Autopilot Design for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle, Applied Mechanics and Materials. Vols. 490-491, pp.700-707, 2014, doi: 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/ AMM. 490-491. 700.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.490-491.700

Google Scholar

[4] V. Kh. Pshikhopov, M. Yu. Medvedev, Block design of robust control systems by direct Lyapunov method, IFAC World Congress, Volume # 18, Part# 1, pp.10875-10880, 2011, doi: 10. 3182/20110828-6-IT-1002. 00006.

DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.00006

Google Scholar

[5] M.Y. Medvedev, V. Kh. Pshikhopov, Robust control of nonlinear dynamic systems, Proceedings of 2010 IEEE Latin-American Conference on Communications (ANDERSON), Bogota, Colombia, pp.1-7, September 14–17, 2010, doi: 10. 1109/ANDESCON. 2010. 5633481.

DOI: 10.1109/andescon.2010.5633481

Google Scholar

[6] V. Pshikhopov, M. Medvedev, V. Kostjukov, R. Fedorenko, B. Gurenko, V. Krukhmalev, Airship autopilot design, SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2736, 2011, doi: 10. 4271/2011-01-2736.

DOI: 10.4271/2011-01-2736

Google Scholar

[7] V. Kh. Pshikhopov, N.E. Sergeev, M.Y. Medvedev, A.E. Kulchenko, The Design of Helicopter Autopilot, SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-2098, 2012, doi: 10. 4271/2012-01-(2098).

DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-2098

Google Scholar

[8] P. Jantapremjit and P. A. Wilson, Autonomous homing and docking tasks for an underwater vehicle., In: 2nd International Conference on Underwater Systems, Bali, Indonesia,. Bali, Indonesia, Underwater Society of Indonesia, 6pp, 04 - 05 Nov (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2007.4398953

Google Scholar

[9] S. Cowen, S. Briest, and J. Dombrowski, Underwater docking of autonomous undersea vehicles using optical terminal guidance, In Proceedings of MTS/IEEE OCEANS97, volume 2, pages 1143–1147, (1997).

DOI: 10.1109/oceans.1997.624153

Google Scholar

[10] M.D. Feezor, F. Yates Sorrell, P.R. Blankinship, and J.G. Bellingham. Autonomous underwater vehicle homing/docking via electromagnetic guidance, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, No. 26(4), p.515–521, (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/48.972086

Google Scholar

[11] Pan-Mook Lee, Bong-Hwan Jeon, and Sea-Moon Kim, Visual servoing for underwater docking of an autonomous underwater vehicle with one camera, In Proceedings of OCEANS 2003, volume 2, p.677–682, (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2003.178391

Google Scholar

[12] Evans, J., Redmond, P., Plakas, C., Hamilton, K., and Lane, D. Autonomous docking for intervention-AUVs using sonar a video-based real-time 3D pose estimation, In Proc. OCEANS 2003., volume 4, pp.220-225, 22-26 Sept. (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2003.178243

Google Scholar

[13] Mariusz Waz, Krzysztof Naus, The Precise Method of Navigation for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, " Proceedings of the 16th WSEAS International Conference on Circuits (part of CSCC , 12, pp.209-215, (2012).

Google Scholar

[14] Wettergreen, D., Gaskett, C., and Zelinsky, A. Development of a visually-guided autonomous underwater vehicle, " In Proc. of OCEAN, 98 Conference, volume 2, p.1200–1204, (1998).

DOI: 10.1109/oceans.1998.724425

Google Scholar

[15] Wang, H., Rock, S., and Lees, M. Experiments in automatic retrieval of underwater objects with an AUV, " In Proc. OCEANS , 95. MTS/IEEE., volume 1, p.366–373. 9-12 Oct (1995).

DOI: 10.1109/oceans.1995.526796

Google Scholar

[16] V. Kh. Pshikhopov, M. Y. Medvedev, M.Y. Sirotenko, V.A. Kostjukov, Control System Design for Robotic Airship., 9-th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control. pp.26-31. September 9 – 12, 2009 doi: 10. 3182/20090909-4-JP-2010. 00007.

DOI: 10.3182/20090909-4-jp-2010.00007

Google Scholar

[17] Sh. Sehati Dehkharghani, A. Bekiarski, S. Pleshkova, Application of Probabilistic Methods in Mobile Robots Audio Visual Motion Control Combined with Laser Range Finder Distance Measurements, " proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive and Transportation Systems (ICAT , 12), pp.91-99, (2012).

Google Scholar