Finite Element Analysis of Casing Material Behavior in Steam Injection Well Operations

Article Preview

Abstract:

Casing design is one of the most important parts of the well planning in the oil and gas industry. Various factors affecting the casing material needs to be considered by the drilling engineers. Wells partaking in thermal oil recovery processes undergo extreme temperature variation and this induces high thermal stresses in the casings. Therefore, forecasting the material behavior and checking for failure mechanisms becomes highly important. This paper uses Finite Element Methods to analyze the behavior two of the frequently used materials for casing - J55 and L80 steels. Modeling the casing and application of boundary conditions are performed through Ansys Workbench. Effect of steam injection pressure and temperature on the materials is presented in this work, indicating the possibilities of failure during heating cycle. The change in diameter of the casing body due to axial restriction is also presented. This paper aims to draw special attention towards the casing design in high temperature conditions of the well.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

196-200

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K.C. Hong: Steamflood Reservoir Management Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery. Pennwell Publishing Company, Oklahoma.

Google Scholar

[2] P. G. Willhite and W. K. Dietrich, Design Criteria for Completion of Steam Injection Wells, The Journal of Petroleum Technology, January edition, Pg. 15-21, (1967).

DOI: 10.2118/1560-pa

Google Scholar

[3] K. Maruyama, E. Tsuru, M. Ogasawara, Y. Inoue and E. J. Peters, An Experimental Study of Casing Performance Under Thermal Cycling Conditions, SPE Drilling Engineering, June edition, Pg. 156-164, (1990).

DOI: 10.2118/18776-pa

Google Scholar

[4] J. Wu and M. E. Knauss, Casing Temperature and Stress Analysis in Steam-Injection Wells, SPE International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, China, (2006).

DOI: 10.2118/103882-ms

Google Scholar

[5] J. C. R. Placido, P. Jr. Adema, L. Paulo, I. P. Pasqualion, and S. F. Estefan, StressAnalysis of Casing String Submitted to Cyclic Steam Injection, Fifth Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference and Exhibition, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (1997).

Google Scholar

[6] C. Teodoriu and G. Falcone, Comparing Completion Design in Hydrocarbon and Geothermal Wells: The need to evaluate the integrity of casing connections subject to thermal stresses, Geothermics, vol. 38, Pg. 238-246, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.11.006

Google Scholar

[7] G. B. Lepper, Production Casing Performance In a Thermal Field, Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, September edition; Vol. 37, No. 9, (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Wu, M. E. Knaussand T. Kritzler, Casing Failures in Cyclic Steam Injection Wells, IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, (2008).

DOI: 10.2118/114231-ms

Google Scholar

[9] J. Wu, M. E. Gonzalez, and N. Hosn, Steam-Injection Casing Design, SPE Western Regional Meeting held in Irvine, CA, U.S. A, (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] Information on www. contalloy. com/materials/alloy-steelretrieved on 21 May (2014).

Google Scholar

[11] J. Norwinka, T. Kaiser and B. Lepper, Strain-based Design of Tubulars for Extreme-Service Wells, SPE Drilling and Completion, December edition, Pg. 353-360, (2008).

DOI: 10.2118/105717-pa

Google Scholar

[12] D. D. Acqua, M. Hodder and T. M. V. Kaiser, Burst and Collapse Responses of Production Casing in Themal Applications, SPE Drilling and Completion, March edition, Pg 93-104, (2013).

DOI: 10.2118/151810-pa

Google Scholar