Monitoring of Surface Roughness Based on Cutting Force and Cutting Temperature in Ball-End Milling Process by Utilizing Response Surface Analysis

Panrawee Yaisuk; Somkiat Tangjitsitcharoen

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.799-800.324

Paper Titles

Experimental Investigation of Effects of Machining Parameters on Surface Roughness and Chip Formation of Aluminum Alloys by Face Turning
p.299

Intensification of Compaction and Hardening of Iron Powder Parts and Powder Steels at the Stage of Cold Molding before Sintering
p.307

Intelligent Prediction of Tool Wear in Ball-End Milling Process Based on Dimensionless Cutting Force Ratio
p.312

Electropolishing Parameters for Nickel Coating Replacement of Hard Disk Actuator Arm
p.319

Monitoring of Surface Roughness Based on Cutting Force and Cutting Temperature in Ball-End Milling Process by Utilizing Response Surface Analysis
p.324

Study of Support Structure in Solid Based Rapid Prototyping Technique – FDM Approach
p.329

A Novel Dovetail Joining Method for Planar Panels with Non-Orthogonal Cut Surfaces
p.335

Experimental Analysis of Machining Parameters in WEDM of AISI D3 Steel Using Taguchi Method
p.343

Ion Nitriding of Gears with Hollow Cathode Effect
p.351

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 799-800Monitoring of Surface Roughness Based on Cutting...

Monitoring of Surface Roughness Based on Cutting Force and Cutting Temperature in Ball-End Milling Process by Utilizing Response Surface Analysis

Abstract:

The surface roughness is monitored using the cutting force and the cutting temperature in the ball-end milling process by utilizing the response surface analysis with the Box-Behnken design. The optimum cutting condition is obtained referring to the minimum surface roughness, which is the spindle speed, the feed rate, the depth of cut, and the tool diameter. The models of cutting force ratio and the cutting temperature are proposed and developed based on the experimental results. It is understood that the surface roughness is improved with an increase in spindle speed, feed rate and depth of cut. The cutting temperature decreases with an increase in tool diameter. The model verification has showed that the experimentally obtained surface roughness model is reliable and accurate to estimate the surface roughness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Mechanical and Electrical Technology VII

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 799-800)

Pages:

324-328

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.799-800.324

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2015

Authors:

Panrawee Yaisuk, Somkiat Tangjitsitcharoen*

Keywords:

Ball-End Milling, Box-Behnken Design, Cutting Force, Cutting Temperature, Response Surface Analysis, Surface Roughness

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Siriwan C. and Somkiat T., in: Advanced Material Research (2011), pp.335-336.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Bharathi Raja and N. Baskar, in: Expert Systems with Applications 39(2012), p.5982–5989.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Tangjitsitcharoen, in: Advanced Materials Research199-200 (2011), 1958-(1966).

Google Scholar

[4] Dr. Mike S. Lou, Dr. Joseph C. Chen and Dr. Caleb M. Li: submitted toJournal of Industrial Technology(1999).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Tangjitsitcharoen, K. Samanmit and S. Ratanakuakangwan: submitted to Journal of Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 490-491(2014): pp.207-212.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.490-491.207

Google Scholar

[6] Feng Jiang, Jianfeng Li, Yiming (Kevin) Rong, Jie Sun1 and Song Zhang, The 41st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Prof. Dr. -Ing. J. Kodácsyand Prof. Dr. -Ing. A. Szabó, Seminar ModerneSchleiftechnologie, Villingen-Schwenningen (D) (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] LIU Yi-jian, ZHANG Jian-ming, WANG Shu-qing: submitted toJournal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE(2005), pp.1026-1029.

DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2005.a1026

Google Scholar

[9] DimitriosVakondios, PanagiotisKyratsis, Suleyman Yaldiz and Aristomenis Antoniadis, Measurement 45(2012), p.1480–1488.

Google Scholar

[10] AbdallahNasri, Mihed Ben Said, WassilaBouzidSai, Emirates: submitted to Journal for Engineering Research16 (2011), pp.67-78.

Google Scholar

[11] Xiaoxiao Chen, Jun Zhao, Yueen Li, Shiguo Han, Qingyuan Cao and Anhai Li, Int J AdvManuf Technol59(2012), p.885–898.

Google Scholar

[12] Kwak JS, Int J Machine Tools Manuf(2005), p.327–334.

Google Scholar

[13] Kincl M, Turk S. andVrecer F, Int J Pharm(2005), p.39–49.

Google Scholar

[14] Gunaraj V. andMurugan N., J Mater Process Technol(1999), p.266–275.

Google Scholar

[15] N. Aslan and Y. Cebeci, Fuel 86(2007), p.90–97.

Google Scholar