Vibroacustical Method for Measuring the Effect of Cavitation Erosion

Article Preview

Abstract:

One of the most harmful effects of cavitation, with strong influence on the life of the hydraulic machines is the destruction caused by erosion Since its discovery, over 150 years ago, evaluating the degradation is achieved by mass of material removed by erosion in a given time, which in the case of rotors and blades of hydraulic machines and marine propeller blades are equivalent by amount of electrode consumption for filling the voids left by the removal of material. Laboratory research on cavitation, from the beginning until now, evaluates the intensity of cavitation erosion rate, defined as a mass of material removed by erosion at a certain time of attack.The purpose of this paper is to develop and validate a technique based on vibroacoustic signal analysis of corroded samples, and that through their natural frequencies deviations to emphasize mass loss.The experimental measurement of the vibroacustic response of corroded specimens is carried out by using a condenser microphone. The vibration responses, in free-free conditions of the specimens, are analyzed using algorithm based on Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The results are compared with other indicators of cavitation corrosion, such as lost mass and mass loss rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

317-322

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Jayaprakash, J.K. Choi, G.L. Chahine, F. Martin, M. Donnelly, J.P. Franc, A. Karimi Scaling study of cavitation pitting from cavitating jets and ultrasonic horns, Wear, 296 (2012), 619–629.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.07.025

Google Scholar

[2] I. Tzanakis, D.G. Eskin, A. Georgoulas, D.K. Fytanidis, Incubation pit analysis and calculation of the hydrodynamic impact pressure from the implosion of an acoustic cavitation bubble, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21 (2014) 866–878.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.10.003

Google Scholar

[3] J.K. Choi, A. Jayaprakash, G. L. Chahine, Scaling of cavitation erosion progression with cavitation intensity and cavitation source, Wear, 278 (2012), 53–61.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.01.008

Google Scholar

[4] J.P. Franca, M. Riondeta, A. Karimib, G. L. Chahine, Material and velocity effects on cavitation erosion pitting, Wear 274– 275 (2012) 248– 259.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.09.006

Google Scholar

[5] P. Zima, M. Sedlář, M. Müller, Modeling collapse aggressiveness of cavitation bubbles in hydromachinery, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Cavitation, CAV2009, 1-7.

DOI: 10.3850/978-981-07-2826-7_209

Google Scholar

[6] C.I. Lupinca, M.D. Nedeloni, Comparative study regarding the cavitation erosion behavior of Cu and Al alloys, International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, V. 3 (2014) No. 2, 95-99.

Google Scholar

[7] I. Bordeasu, M. O. Popoviciu, L. M. Micu, L. Salcianu, C. Bordeasu, Cavitation erosion researches upon two AMPCO bronzes, Machine Design, Vol. 6(2014) No. 3, 97-102.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/106/1/012001

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http: /www. sigmaplot. com/products/autosignal/autosignal. php 13. 06. (2015).

Google Scholar