Effect of Diameter on Fire Exposed Concrete-Filled Double Skin Steel Tubular (CFDST) Columns under Concentric Axial Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concrete-filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST) columns with three different diameters were exposed to fire following ASTM E-119 fire curve. The temperature was kept constant for 60 minutes after reaching 600°C. After the cooling down process, the columns were tested under concentric axial load condition until failure. Maximum loads, displacement and strain were recorded during testing. Failure patterns were observed. In this paper, failure patterns, increment or reduction of residual strength, ductility and stiffness are reported and discussed in details. All tested CFDST columns failed by local buckling and crushing of concrete. As expected, residual strength index (RSI) decreased with increased fire exposure time. Whereas, larger diameter heated specimen retain more than 50% of it corresponding room temperature secant stiffness. In addition, ductility index (DI) of larger diameter specimen shows an enhancement after fire exposure. Highest enhancement in DI was observed in 90 minutes fire exposure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

130-135

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. H. Han, Y. J. Li and F. Y. Liao, Concrete-filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST) columns subjected to long-term sustained loading, Thin-Walled Struct. 49 (2011) 1534–43.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.08.001

Google Scholar

[2] M. F. Hassanein, O. F. Kharoob, Compressive strength of circular concrete-filled double skin tubular short columns, Thin-Walled Struct. 77 (2014) 165–73.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.10.004

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Tao, L. H. Han and X. L. Zhao, Behaviour of concrete-filled double skin (CHS inner and CHS outer) steel tubular stub columns and beam-columns, J. Constr. Steel Res. 60 (2004) 1129–58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.11.008

Google Scholar

[4] K. Uenaka, H. Kitoh and K. Sonoda, Concrete filled double skin circular stub columns under compression, Thin-Walled Struct. 48 (2010) 19–24.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2009.08.001

Google Scholar

[5] X. L. Zhao, B. Han and R. H. Grzebieta, Plastic mechanism analysis of concrete-filled double-skin (SHS inner and SHS outer) stub columns, Thin-Walled Struct. 40 (2002) 815–33.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(02)00030-7

Google Scholar

[6] L. H. Han, W. Li and R. Bjorhovde, Developments and advanced applications of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) structures: Members, J. Constr. Steel Res. 100 (2014) 211–28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.016

Google Scholar

[7] H. Lu, X. L. Zhao and L. H. Han, FE modelling and fire resistance design of concrete filled double skin tubular columns, J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (2011) 1733–48.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.04.014

Google Scholar

[8] H. Lu, L. H. Han and X. L. Zhao, Fire performance of self-consolidating concrete filled double skin steel tubular columns: Experiments Fire Saf. J. 45 (2010) 106–15.

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.12.001

Google Scholar

[9] H. Lu, X. L. Zhao and L. H. Han, Testing of self-consolidating concrete-filled double skin tubular stub columns exposed to fire, J. Constr. Steel Res. 66 (2010) 1069–80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.004

Google Scholar

[10] Y. F. Yang, L. H. Han, Concrete-filled double-skin tubular columns under fire, Mag. Concr. Res. 60 (2008) 211–22.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.2007.00074

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM 2010, ASTM E119-11: Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, (2010).

Google Scholar

[12] Z. Tao, L. H. Han, Behaviour of fire-exposed concrete-filled steel tubular beam columns repaired with CFRP wraps, Thin-Walled Struct. 45 (2007) 63–76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2006.11.004

Google Scholar

[13] F. Liu, L. Gardner and H. Yang, Post-fire behaviour of reinforced concrete stub columns confined by circular steel tubes, J. Constr. Steel Res. 102 (2014) 82–103.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.06.015

Google Scholar