Effects of Coal Bottom Ash on the Compressive Strength of Portland Cement Mortar

Article Preview

Abstract:

The possibility of utilizing treated coal bottom ash as a partial replacement of Portland cement was examined through compressive strength test on mortar samples. A total of 16 batches of mortar mixtures with cement:sand ratio of 1:2.5 and 1:2.75 were prepared using two types of treated coal bottom ash. The chemical compositions including the unburned carbon of coal bottom ash were also analyzed. In order to remove the excess unburned carbon which will affect the potential pozzolanic properties, the coal bottom ash was heated at 550 ± 50oC and 700 ± 50°C for 60 min in an electrical furnace.The results showed that compressive strength of mortar mixtures with cement:sand ratio of 1:2.5 and 1:2.75 containing treated coal bottom ash which was heated at 550oC results in an increase in compressive strength. At 10% and 20% of treated coal bottom ash replacement levels to Portland cement, the compressive strength of the mortar mixture was significantly improved at the age of 28 days. The compressive strength of the mortar mixtures at early ages gives lower strength as compared to the plain Portland cement mortar. However, the effect of treated coal bottom ash that was heated at 700°C is to reduce the compressive strength of the mortar mixtures except for mixture with cement:sand ratio of 1:2.5 containing 10% coal bottom ash at 56 days.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

149-154

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Goodarzi, Environmental Asessment of Bottm Ash from Canadian Coal-Fired Power Plants. The open Env. & Biol. Mon. Jour. 2 (2009) 1-10.

Google Scholar

[2] B. Diana, B. Girts, U. Liga, Coal Combustion Bottom Ash as Microfiller with Pozzolanic Properties for Traditional Concrete. 11th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST. Procedia Engineering. 57 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.022

Google Scholar

[3] A. Umar Abubakar, K.S. Baharudin, Potential Use of Malaysian Thermal Power Plants Coal Bottom Ash in Construction. Int. Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology. 3(2) (2012) 25-37.

Google Scholar

[4] B. Juric, L. Hanzic, R. Ilic, N. Samec, Utilization of municipal solid waste bottom ash and recycled aggregate in concrete. Waste Management. 26 (2006) 1436-1442.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.016

Google Scholar

[5] T. Magialardi, A.E. Paolini, A. Polettini, P. Sarini, Optimization of the solidification/stabilization process of MSW fly ash in cementitious matrices. J. Hazard Mater. B70 (1999) 53-70.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00132-6

Google Scholar

[6] M. Djuric, J. Ranogajec, R. Omorjan, S. Miletic, Sulfate corrosion ofPortland cement—pure and blended with 30% of fly ash, Cem. Concr. 26 (1996) 1295– 1300.

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(96)00127-5

Google Scholar

[7] A. Palomo, M.W. Grutzeck, M.T. Blanco, Alkali-activated fly ashes, a cement for future. Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (1999) 983-987.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00243-9

Google Scholar

[8] M. Cheriaf, J. Calvalcante Rocha, J. Pera, Pozzolanic properties of pulverized coal combustion bottom ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 29 (1999) 1387-1391.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(99)00098-8

Google Scholar

[9] I. Kula, A. Olgunb, V. Sevincc, Y. Erdogan, An investigation on the use of tincal ore waste, fly ash, and coal bottom ash as Portland cement replacement materials. Cement and Concrete Research 32 (2002) 227–232.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(01)00661-5

Google Scholar

[10] S.A. Barbhuiya, et al. Properties of fly ash concrete modified with hydrated lime and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (2009) 3233–3239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.001

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM C150 Standard Specification for Portland Cement. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] N.M. Altwair, M.A. Megat Johari, S.F. Saiyid Hashim, Influence of treated palm oil fuel ash on compressive properties and chloride resistance of engineered cementitious composites. Materials and Structures. 47 (2014) 667-682.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-013-0087-4

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM C 618 Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for use in Concrete. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (2012).

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-00

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM C 778-02 Standard Specification for Standard Sand. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania (2003).

Google Scholar

[15] S. Naganathan, L. Tan, Effect of Fly Ash Fineness on the Performance of Cement Mortar. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(3) (2013) 326-331.

Google Scholar

[16] M.A. Megat Johari, A.M. Zeyad, N. Muhamad Bunnori, K.S. Ariffin, Engineering and transport properties of high-strength green concrete containing high volume of ultra-fine palm oil fuel ash. Construction and Building Materials. 30 (2012) 281-288.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.007

Google Scholar

[17] C.B. Cheah, M. Mahyuddin Ramli., Optimization of Mix Proportion of High Performance Mortar for Structural Applications. American J. of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 3 (4) (2010) 643-649.

DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2010.643.649

Google Scholar

[18] ASTM C109 / C109M – 13 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens) (2013).

DOI: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-20

Google Scholar