Application of Recently Developed MCDM Methods for Materials Selection

Dušan Petković; Miloš Madić; Miroslav Radovanović; Predrag Janković

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.809-810.1468

Paper Titles

An Idea of the Continuous Flow for Concurrent Multi-Assortment Production
p.1444

Simulation Aided Production Planning and Scheduling Using Game Theory Approach
p.1450

Using Discrete-Event Simulation Systems as Support for Production Planning
p.1456

Scheduling Schemes Based on Searching the Aggregated Graph of Operations Planning Sequence
p.1462

Application of Recently Developed MCDM Methods for Materials Selection
p.1468

Modeling and Analysis of Processing Flow in a Flexible Manufacturing System Using Synchronized Petri Nets
p.1474

Beyond Target Costing: Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment for New Products
p.1480

Solution Improvement for Existing Concrete Formwork Equipment by Using Creative Methods and PLM Concept
p.1486

Integrating Advanced Engineering Solutions for Enhancing Product Development Sustainability
p.1492

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 809-810Application of Recently Developed MCDM Methods for...

Application of Recently Developed MCDM Methods for Materials Selection

Abstract:

It is well known fact that materials play an important role in engineering design. Nowadays over a hundred thousand available materials can be distinguished with constant tendency for increasing the novel designed materials. Therefore material selection process becomes a complex and time consuming task. Selection of the most suitable material for a given application can be regarded as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem with conflicting and diverse objectives. New MCDM methods have been developed, and existing methods improved, showing that research in the decision-making is important and still valuable. This paper describes the use of recently developed MCDM methods, i.e. Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) for selecting the most suitable hard coating material.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Innovative Manufacturing Engineering 2015

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 809-810)

Pages:

1468-1473

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.809-810.1468

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2015

Authors:

Dušan Petković*, Miloš Madić, Miroslav Radovanović, Predrag Janković

Keywords:

COPRAS, Hard Coating, Material Selection, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, WASPAS

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] P.S. Ramalhete, A.M.R. Senos, C. Aguiar, Digital tools for material selection in product design, Mater. Des. 31 (2010) 2275-2287.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.013

Google Scholar

[2] A. Chauhan, R. Vaish, Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach, Mater. Des. 36 (2012) 1–5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.021

Google Scholar

[3] P. Chatterjee, V.M. Athawale, S. Chakraborty, Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods, Mater. Des. 32 (2011) 851-860.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.010

Google Scholar

[4] P. Chatterjee, S. Chakraborty, Material selection using preferential ranking methods, Mater. Des. 35 (2012) 384–393.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.027

Google Scholar

[5] S.R. Maity, P. Chatterjee, S. Chakraborty, Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method, Mater. Des. 36 (2012) 372–378.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.044

Google Scholar

[6] S. Chakraborty, E.K. Zavadskas, Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making, Informatica. 25(1) (2014) 1–20.

DOI: 10.15388/informatica.2014.01

Google Scholar

[7] A. Chauhan, R. Vaish, Hard coating material selection using multi-criteria decision making, Mater. Des. 44 (2013) 240–245.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.003

Google Scholar

[8] E.K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, V. Sarka, The new method of multi-criteria complex proportional assessment of projects, Technol. Econ. Dev. Eco. 1(3) (1994) 131-139.

Google Scholar

[9] E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Antucheviciene. A. Zakarevicius, Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment, Electronics and Electrical Engineering. 6(122) (2012) 3-6.

DOI: 10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810

Google Scholar

[10] J.K. Lancaster, The relationship between the wear of carbon brush materials and their elastic moduli Br. J. Appl. Phys. 14 (1963) 497-505.

DOI: 10.1088/0508-3443/14/8/311

Google Scholar

[11] Y.W. Bao, W. Wang, Y.C. Zhou, Investigation of the relationship between elastic modulus and hardness based on depth-sensing indentation measurements, Acta. Mater. 52 (2004) 5397-5404.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.002

Google Scholar

[12] T.Y. Tsui, G.M. Pharr, W.C. Oliver, C.S. Bhatia, R. L . White, S. Anders, et al. Nanoindentation and nanoscratching of hard carbon coatings for magnetic disks, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 383 (1995) 447-452.

DOI: 10.1557/proc-383-447

Google Scholar