Studies on Mechanical Properties, Fracture Morphology and Corrosion Behavior of Pulsed MIG Welded AZ31B Magnesium Alloy Sheets

Article Preview

Abstract:

AZ31B Magnesium alloy plates were successfully joined by using alternating current pulsed Metal inert gas welding (AC p-MIGW) with AZ61 Magnesium alloy wire as the filler metal. The macrostructure, tensile strength, micro hardness and corrosion rate of welded magnesium alloy joints were studied. Results showed that magnesium alloy plates could be successfully joined by pulsed MIG welding under specified process parameters. The average tensile strength of the joint was 81.34 N/mm2. The micro hardness was averagely about 67.62 HV. The joint was brittle fractured in the middle of weld zone. The corrosion rate of the welded joint was found to be 0.0112 mm/year.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

480-485

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Lee, S. H. Lee and D. H. Kim, Effect of Y, Sr, and Nd additions on the microstructure and micro fracture mechanism of squeeze cast AZ91-X magnesium alloys, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1998, 29A, 1221–1235.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-998-0249-0

Google Scholar

[2] E. Robert, Magnesium alloys and their applications, Light Met. Age, 2001, 6, 54–58.

Google Scholar

[3] Z. D. Zhang and F. Zhang, Spectral analysis of welding plasma of magnesium alloy using flux coated wire, Mater. Trans., 2009, 50, 1909–(1914).

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.m2009023

Google Scholar

[4] L. M. Zhao and Z. D. Zhang, Effect of Zn alloy interlayer on interface microstructure and strength of diffusion-bonded Mg–Al joints, Scr. Mater., 2008, 58, 283–286.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.006

Google Scholar

[5] T. Byrd, Inverter power sources: an efficient alternative, Weld. J., 1993, 72, 37–42.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. M. Zhang, E. Liguo and R. Kovacevic, Active metal transfer control by monitoring excited droplet oscillation, Weld. J., 1998, 77, 388s–395s.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Thamodharan, H. P. Beck and A. Wolf, Steady and pulsed direct current welding with a single converter, Weld. J., 1999, 78, 75s–79s.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Rethmeier and S. Wiesner, Characteristic features of MIG welding of magnesium alloys, Z. Metallkd, 2001, 92, 281–285.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Wohlfahrt, M. Rethmeier, B. Bouaifi and M. Schutz, Metal inert gas welding of magnesium alloys, Weld. Cutt., 2003, 55, 80–84.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Rethmeier, B. Kleinpeter and H. Wohlfahrt, MIG welding of magnesium alloys metallographic aspects, Weld. World, 2004, 48, 28–33.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03266424

Google Scholar

[11] T. Ueyama and K. Nakata, Pulsed MIG welding of magnesium alloy, Kei Kinzoku Yosetsu, 2004, 42, 203–213.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Wang, G. Song and L.M. Liu, Welding technology and microstructure of MIG welded magnesium alloy, Trans. Chn Weld. Inst., 2009, 30, 109–112.

Google Scholar

[13] C. H. Jennings and A. B. White, Magnetic arc blow, Weld. J., 1941, 20, 427s–436s.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Tong, T. Ueyama, S. Harada and M. Ushio: Quality and productivity improvement in aluminium alloy thin sheet welding using alternating current pulsed metal inert gas welding system, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2001, 6, 203–208.

DOI: 10.1179/136217101101538776

Google Scholar

[15] T. Ueyama, H. Tong, S. Harada, R. Passmore and M. Ushhio, AC pulsed GMAW improves sheet metal joining, Weld. J., 2005, 84, 40–46.

Google Scholar

[16] G. Padmanaban, & V. Balasubramanian, Optimization of pulsed current gas tungsten arc welding process parameters to attain maximum tensile strength in AZ31B magnesium alloy. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2013, 21(3), 467–476, Doi: 10. 1016/S1003-6326(11)60738-3.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(11)60738-3

Google Scholar

[17] Cao, R., Wen, B. F., Chen, J. H., & Wang, P. Cold Metal Transfer joining of magnesium AZ31B-to-aluminum A6061-T6., J. Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 560, 256–266. Doi: 10. 1016 /j. msea. 2012. 09. 065.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.065

Google Scholar