Optimization of GMAW Parameters to Improve the Mechanical Properties

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, multi objective optimization of Gas Metal Arc Welding GMAW) parameters are carried out to yield good mechanical strength in welded joints. Most of the failures are occurred on the welded elements due to the setting of improper welding parameters. The strength of welded joints in GMAW depends on several input process parameters such as welding current, welding voltage, gas flow rate, torch angle, welding speed, wire size and electrode feed rate. Wrong selection of these process parameters will lead to bad quality welds. So there is a need to control the process parameters to obtain good quality welded joints. For getting the better values of these parameters, it needs to conduct experiments by varying the input process parameters that are affecting the strength of the welded joints. In this work nine experimental runs based on an L9 orthogonal array of Taguchi method are performed to optimize the strength of the welded joint. To achieve this Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) is used. In this work Aluminum6063 material is used as base material.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

456-461

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ajit Hooda, Ashwani Dhingra, Satpal Sharma, Optimization of MIG welding process parameters to predict maximum yield strength in AISI 1040, Int. J. Mech. Engg. Robo. Res. 1 (2012) 203-213.

Google Scholar

[2] Shih Jing-Shiang, Tzeng Yih-Fong, Yang Jin-Bin, Principal component analysis for multiple quality characteristics optimization of metal inert gas welding aluminum foam plate, Mat. Des. 32, (2011) 1253–1261.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.10.001

Google Scholar

[3] Mohd. Shoeb, Mohd. Parvez, Effect of MIG welding input process parameters on weld bead geometry on Hsla steel, Int. J. Engg. Sci. Technol. 5, (2013) 200-212.

Google Scholar

[4] Manikya Kanti, Srinivasa Rao, Prediction of bead geometry in pulsed GMA welding using back propagation neural network, Mat. Proces. Technol. 200, (2008) 300–305.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.034

Google Scholar

[5] Lin, Use of the Taguchi method and grey relational analysis to optimize turning operations with multiple performance characteristics, Mat. Manuf. Proces. 19 (2004) 209–220.

DOI: 10.1081/amp-120029852

Google Scholar

[6] Meshra S.R., Pohokar N. S, Optimization of process parameters of gas metal arc welding to improve quality of weld bead geometry, Int. J. Engg. Busines. Ent. Appln. 5 (2013) 46-52.

Google Scholar

[7] Irullappasamy Siva, Jebas Thangaih Winowlin Jappes, Pandian Pitchipoo, Sandro Campos Amico, Erumaipatty Rajagounder Nagarajan and Nainar Azhagesan, Grey optimization of process parameters of surface modification of coconut sheath reinforced polymer composites, J. Poly. Engg. 33 (2013).

DOI: 10.1515/polyeng-2012-0151

Google Scholar

[8] Alexandre Saldanha do Naseimento and Diandro Bailoni Fernandes, Methodology for determination of parameters for welding MIG with variable polarity, J. Weld. Int. 23(2009)473-480.

Google Scholar

[9] Jair Carlos Dutra, Regis Henrique Goncalves e Silva, Melting and welding power characteristics of MIG–CMT versus conventional MIG for aluminium 5183, J. Weld. Int. 29, (2015) 181-186.

DOI: 10.1080/09507116.2014.932974

Google Scholar

[10] Borrego, Costa, Jesus, Loureiro, Ferreira, Fatigue life improvement by friction stir processing of 5083 Aluminium alloy MIG butt welds. J. Theo. App. Frac. Mech. 70 (2014) 68–74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.02.002

Google Scholar

[11] Danut Iordachescu, Luisa Quintino, Rosa Miranda and Gervasio Pimenta, Influence of shielding gases and process parameters on metal, Mat. Des. 27 (2006) 381–390.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.010

Google Scholar

[12] Tewari , Ankur Gupta, Jyoti Prakash, Effect of welding parameters on the weld ability of material, Int. J. Engg. Sci. Tech. 2 (2010) 512-516.

Google Scholar