Progress in Wind Environment and Outdoor Air Ventilation at Pedestrian Level in Urban Area

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper reviews the progress made in outdoor wind environment and outdoor ventilation at pedestrian level in urban area for the past few decades until today. The focus is on the effect of wind on people at pedestrian level and how the urban geometry can influence the flow field around the building. Section 1 explains the effect of natural wind environment on comfort and safety of the pedestrian. Section 2 describes the characteristic of pedestrian wind and flow pattern around the building due to the building geometry arrangement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

236-240

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hunt JCR, Poulton EC, Mumford JC. The effects of wind on people; New criteria based on wind tunnel experiments. Building and Environment. 1976; 11: 15-28.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(76)90015-9

Google Scholar

[2] Murakami S, Deguchi K. New criteria for wind effects on pedestrians. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1981; 7: 289-309.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(81)90055-6

Google Scholar

[3] Melbourne WH. Criteria for environmental wind conditions. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1978; 3: 241-9.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(78)90013-2

Google Scholar

[4] Ohba M, Kobayashi N, Murakami S. Study on the assessment of environmental wind conditions at ground level in a built-up area - based on long-term measurements using portable 3-cup anemometers. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1988; 28: 129-38.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(88)90109-2

Google Scholar

[5] Ratcliff MA, Peterka JA. Comparison of pedestrian wind acceptability criteria. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1990; 36, Part 2: 791-800.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-6105(90)90076-o

Google Scholar

[6] Bottema M. A method for optimisation of wind discomfort criteria. Building and Environment. 2000; 35: 1-18.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(98)00065-1

Google Scholar

[7] Janssen WD, Blocken B, van Hooff T. Pedestrian wind comfort around buildings: Comparison of wind comfort criteria based on whole-flow field data for a complex case study. Building and Environment. 2013; 59: 547-62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.012

Google Scholar

[8] Abd Razak A, Hagishima A, Ikegaya N, Tanimoto J. Analysis of airflow over building arrays for assessment of urban wind environment. Building and Environment. 2013; 59: 56-65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.08.007

Google Scholar

[9] Hang J, Li Y, Sandberg M, Claesson L. Wind conditions and ventilation in high-rise long street models. Building and Environment. 2010; 45: 1353-65.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.11.019

Google Scholar

[10] Kubota T, Miura M, Tominaga Y, Mochida A. Wind tunnel tests on the relationship between building density and pedestrian-level wind velocity: Development of guidelines for realizing acceptable wind environment in residential neighborhoods. Building and Environment. 2008; 43: 1699-708.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.015

Google Scholar

[11] Zhang A, Gao C, Zhang L. Numerical simulation of the wind field around different building arrangements. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2005; 93: 891-904.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2005.09.001

Google Scholar

[12] Hu T, Yoshie R. Indices to evaluate ventilation efficiency in newly-built urban area at pedestrian level. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2013; 112: 39-51.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.11.002

Google Scholar

[13] Ikeda Y, Ikegaya N, Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Abd Razak A. Characteristics of spatio-temporal fluctuation of urban pedestrian wind derived from Large-Eddy Simulation. 6th International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering -CWE2014. University of Hamburg, Germany2014.

Google Scholar

[14] Kato S, Huang H. Ventilation efficiency of void space surrounded by buildings with wind blowing over built-up urban area. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2009; 97: 358-67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.05.003

Google Scholar

[15] Asfour OS. Prediction of wind environment in different grouping patterns of housing blocks. Energy and Buildings. 2010; 42: 2061-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.06.015

Google Scholar

[16] Santiago J, Martilli A, Martín F. CFD simulation of airflow over a regular array of cubes. Part I: Three-dimensional simulation of the flow and validation with wind-tunnel measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 2007; 122: 609-34.

DOI: 10.1007/s10546-006-9123-z

Google Scholar

[17] Baskaran A, Kashef A. Investigation of air flow around buildings using computational fluid dynamics techniques. Engineering Structures. 1996; 18: 861-75.

DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00154-9

Google Scholar

[18] Hosker Jr R. Empirical estimation of wake cavity size behind block-type structures. Environmental Research Laboratories. 1979: 299.

Google Scholar

[19] Martinuzzi R, Tropea C. The Flow Around Surface-Mounted, Prismatic Obstacles Placed in a Fully Developed Channel Flow (Data Bank Contribution). Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1993; 115: 85-92.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2910118

Google Scholar

[20] Oke TR. Street design and urban canopy layer climate. Energy and Buildings. 1988; 11: 103-13.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6

Google Scholar

[21] Sini J-F, Anquetin S, Mestayer PG. Pollutant dispersion and thermal effects in urban street canyons. Atmospheric Environment. 1996; 30: 2659-77.

DOI: 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00321-5

Google Scholar

[22] Coceal O, Thomas TG, Castro IP, Belcher SE. Mean Flow and Turbulence Statistics Over Groups of Urban-like Cubical Obstacles. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 2006; 121: 491-519.

DOI: 10.1007/s10546-006-9076-2

Google Scholar

[23] Abd Razak A, Hagishima A, Ikegaya N, Mohamad MF, Zaki SA. Mean Wind Flow Field around Idealized Block Arrays with Various Aspect Ratios. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013; 393: 767-73.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.393.767

Google Scholar

[24] Hang J, Li Y. Ventilation strategy and air change rates in idealized high-rise compact urban areas. Building and Environment. 2010; 45: 2754-67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.06.004

Google Scholar

[25] Jiang D, Jiang W, Liu H, Sun J. Systematic influence of different building spacing, height and layout on mean wind and turbulent characteristics within and over urban building arrays. Wind & Sturctures. 2008; 11: 275-89.

DOI: 10.12989/was.2008.11.4.275

Google Scholar

[26] Hunter LJ, Johnson GT, Watson ID. An investigation of three-dimensional characteristics of flow regimes within the urban canyon. Atmospheric Environment. 1992; 26: 425-32.

DOI: 10.1016/0957-1272(92)90049-x

Google Scholar

[27] Hang J, Li Y, Sandberg M, Buccolieri R, Di Sabatino S. The influence of building height variability on pollutant dispersion and pedestrian ventilation in idealized high-rise urban areas. Building and Environment. 2012; 56: 346-60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.023

Google Scholar

[28] Al-Sallal KA, Al-Rais L. Outdoor airflow analysis and potential for passive cooling in the modern urban context of Dubai. Renewable Energy. 2012; 38: 40-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.046

Google Scholar