A Review on Butanol and Ethanol Fuels in Internal Combustion Engines

Article Preview

Abstract:

A controversial argument about alternative fuels is taking lots of researchers and scientists attention and so far ethanol and butanol, regardless their blending percentage, are the most promising alcohols due to their potential properties and low production cost. Many studies have been conducted to justify the optimum fuel to be implemented. In this work, a review will be conducted on both butanol and ethanol in internal combustion engine as well as their contribution in combustion engine regarding combustion performance, pollutant emission, ignition timing and knocking. According to the previous literature, an attractive advantage for alcohol-gasoline blends is that they don’t require engine modification design and still reduce the pollutant emission effectively. The properties of these fuels seem to prove not only that we can run our engines with a reduction of pollutant gases but with the emission of greenhouse gasses. This work will provide a review on ethanol and butanol as an alternative fuels and their properties and behaviour in the engine will be described individually.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

259-264

Citation:

Online since:

January 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yuksel B, An Investigation of the Using Ethanol as a Fuel on the Agricultural Diesel Engine. PhD Thesis, Ataturk University, (1984).

Google Scholar

[2] Yuksel F, The Use of Gasoline-Ethanol Blend as a Fuel at the SI Engine. PhD Thesis, Ataturk University, (1996).

Google Scholar

[3] Wei-Dong Hsieha, Rong-Hong Chenb, Tsung-Lin Wub, Ta-Hui Lina, Engine Performance and Pollutant Emission of an SI Engine Using Ethanol Gasoline Blended Fuels, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00508-8

Google Scholar

[4] Thomas Wallner, Scott A. Miers &Steve McConnell A, Comparison of Ethanol and Butanol as Oxygenates Using a Direct-Injection, Spark-Ignition Engine, (2009).

DOI: 10.1115/ices2008-1690

Google Scholar

[5] Farrell, J. T., Johnston, R. J., and Androulakis, I. P., Molecular Structure Effects on Laminar Burning Velocities at Elevated Temperature and Pressure, 2004, SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2936.

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-2936

Google Scholar

[6] Davis, G., Heil, E., and Rust, R., Ethanol Vehicle Cold Start Improvement When Using a Hydrogen Supplemented E85 Fuel, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002, Paper No. AIAA-2000-2849.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-2849

Google Scholar

[7] Fikret Yu¨ ksel , Bedri Yu¨ksel, The Use of Ethanol-Gasoline Blend as a Fuel in an SI Engine, (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Szwaja a, b, J.D. Naber , Combustion of n-Butanol in a Spark-Ignition IC Engine, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.043

Google Scholar

[9] Yacoub Y, Bara R, Gautam M, The Performance and Emission Characteristics of C1–C5 Alcohol-Gasoline Blends with Matched Oxygen Content in a Single-Cylinder Spark Ignition Engine. Proc Inst Mech Eng A – Power Energy 1998; 212: 363–79.

DOI: 10.1243/0957650981536934

Google Scholar

[10] Dagaut P, Togbe C, Oxidation Kinetics of Butanol–Gasoline Surrogate Mixtures in a Jet-Stirred Reactor: Experimental and Modeling study. Fuel 2008; 87: 3313–21.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.05.008

Google Scholar

[11] Wallner T, Frazee R. Study of Regulated and Non-Regulated Emissions from Combustion of Gasoline, Alcohol Fuels and Their blends in a DI-SI Engine, 2010, SAE Paper No. 2010-01-1571.

DOI: 10.4271/2010-01-1571

Google Scholar

[12] G. Broustail a, b, F. Halter a, P. Seers b, G. Moréac c, C. Mounaim-Rousselle, Comparison of Regulated and Non-Regulated Pollutants with Iso-Octane/Butanol and Iso-Octane/Ethanol Blends in a Port-Fuel Injection Spark-Ignition Engine, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.068

Google Scholar

[13] Lowi AJ, Carter WPL. A Method for Evaluating the Atmospheric Ozone Impact of Actual Vehicle Emissions. SAE; 1990 (900710).

DOI: 10.4271/900710

Google Scholar