Impact of Adjacent Building on Outdoor Ventilation around a Layout of Two Buildings

Abstract:

The outdoor air ventilation impact of a taller building in different configurations of a layout of two adjacent buildings is presented in this paper. The critical parameters investigated are the separation distance (S) between the buildings and the ratio of height of downwind building to that of the building upwind, herein referred to as building height ratio (HR). The aim is to explore intermediate spacing distances which may engender acceptable ventilation around the buildings. A three-dimensional (3-D) numerical simulation employing the Computational Fluid Dynamics technique which adopts the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equation and the realizable k-ε turbulence model was used to study the turbulent flow field around the full-scale two-building configurations. Results show that velocity ratio generally increases with height ratio, indicating that more air motion is induced at the pedestrian level as the height of the downwind building increases. For each of the height ratios, there is a spacing distance at which the velocity ratio is highest. The spacing distances at which the maximum velocity ratio occurs for the various height ratios are proposed. The dimensionless air exchange rate generally increases with height ratio, indicating that greater quantity of air from within the cavity between the buildings is exchanged with air from outside the cavity, which should result in better air quality. The findings of the study demonstrate the importance of incorporating wind data of an urban area in formulating guidelines for layout of buildings.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 819)
• Pages: 250-256
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.819.250
• Online since: January 2016
• Authors: Ayo Samuel Adinoyi*, Normah Mohd-Ghazali, Shuhaimi Mansor
• Keywords: Air Exchange Rate, Buildings Height Ratio, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Outdoor Air Ventilation, Separation Distance, Wind Velocity Ratio

References

[1] K. Uehara, S. Murakami, S. Oikawa, S. Wakamatsu, Wind tunnel experiments on how thermal stratification affects flow in and above urban street canyons, Atmospheric Environment. 34 (2000) 1553-1562.

DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00410-0

[2] Ansys (2011). ANSYS Release 14. 0. User's Guide, Canonsburg, ANSYS Inc.

[3] Y. Tominaga, A. Mochida, T. Shirasawa, R. Yoshie, H. Kataoka, K. Harimoto, T. Nozu, Cross comparisons of CFD results of wind environment at pedestrian level around a high-rise building and within a building complex, Journal of Asian architecture and building engineering. 3 (2004).

DOI: 10.3130/jaabe.3.63

[4] Y. Tominaga, A. Mochida, R. Yoshie, H. Kataoka, T. Nozu, M. Yoshikawa, T. Shirasawa, AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 96 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058

[5] E. Ng, L. Katzschner, U. Wang, C. Ren, L. Chen, Working Paper No. 1A: draft urban climatic analysis map–urban climatic map and standards for wind environment–feasibility study, Technical Report for Planning Department HKSAR, Report No. WP1A, Planning Department of Hong Kong Government: Hong Kong, (2008).

DOI: 10.4324/9781315717616

[6] J. Franke, Recommendations of the COST action C14 on the use of CFD in predicting pedestrian wind environment, in: The fourth international symposium on computational wind engineering, Yokohama, Japan, 2006, 529-532.

[7] J. Franke, A. Hellsten, K.H. Schlunzen, B. Carissimo, (Eds. ), Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment, COST Action 732, quality assurance and improvement of microscale meteorological models, Brussels, COST office, (2007).

DOI: 10.1504/ijep.2011.038443

[8] J. Franke, C. Hirsch, A.G. Jensen, H.W. KruS, M. Schatzmann, P.S. Westbury, S.D. Miles, J.A. Wisse, N.G. Wright, Recommendations on the use of CFD in wind engineering, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Urban Wind Engineering and Building Aerodynamics, in: van Beeck, J.P.A.J. (Ed. ), COST Action C14, Impact of Wind and Storm on City Life Built Environment, 5–7 May 2004 von Karman Institute, Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium.

DOI: 10.5359/jawe.35.63

[9] S.H.L. Yim, J.C.H. Fung, A.K.H. Lau, S.C. Kot, Air ventilation impacts of the wall effect, resulting from the alignment of high-rise buildings. Atmospheric Environment. 43 (2009) 4982-4994.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.002

[10] X-X. Li, C-H. Liu, D.Y.C. Leung, Development of a k-ϵ model for the determination of air exchange rates for street canyons, Atmospheric Environment. 39 (2005) 7285-7296.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.007

[11] C-H. Liu, D.Y. Leung, M.C. Barth, On the prediction of air and pollutant exchange rates in street canyons of different aspect ratios using large-eddy simulation, Atmospheric Environment. 39 (2005) 1567-1574.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.036

[12] X. Xie, C-H. Liu, D.Y. Leung, M.K. Leung, Characteristics of air exchange in a street canyon with ground heating. Atmospheric Environment. 40 (2006) 6396-6409.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.050

[13] X. Xie, Z. Huang, J-S. Wang, Impact of building configuration on air quality in street canyon, Atmospheric Environment. 39 (2005) 4519-4530.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.043

[14] J-S. Wang, Z. Huang, Numerical study on flow and dispersion in rban street canyons of asymmetrical configurations, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B. 18 (2006) 146-150.

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(06)60045-0

[15] J-S. Wang, B-Q. Zhao, C. Ye, D-Q. Yang, Z. Huang, Optimizing layout of urban street canyon using numerical simulation coupling with mathematical optimization, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B. 18 (2006) 345-351.

DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(06)60015-2