Load Redistribution Using Compressive Membrane Action in Reinforced Concrete Buildings

Abstract:

The primary function of any designed structure is to be able to support pre-determined static loads which allow the building to be occupied for its intended use. In the design process the unlikely event that the building is damaged must be considered. Often the focus is directed to the loss of primary loading elements that are fundamental to the integrity of the structure. The damage that is caused as a consequence may propagate causing collapse of surrounding elements culminating with the loss of an extensive proportion of the floor area. To prevent collapse inherent alternative load paths can be utilised. Both the elastic and plastic approved methods for the design of reinforced concrete in modern codes of practice neglect the effect of membrane forces. It has been recognised for some time that the omission of compressive membrane action (CMA), also described as ‘arching action’, can lead to a significant underestimation of load capacity. Previous studies which have attempted to determine if CMA is capable of supporting damaged columns under accidental loading conditions have not had supporting experimental testing of slabs at appropriate span to depth ratios. This paper presents an experimental program conducted on laterally restrained slab strips at approximately half scale. Combined with an analytical study, the extent to which CMA can be used as an effective robustness tool has been assessed.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 82)
• Pages: 272-277
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.82.272
• Online since: July 2011
• Authors: Ben M. Punton, Mike P. Byfield, Peter P. Smith
• Keywords: Compressive Membrane Action, Progressive Collapse, Reinforced Concrete (RC), Structural Robustness

References

[1] Merola , R., Ductility and Robustness of Concrete Structures Under Accidental and Malicious Load Cases, in Department of Civil Engineering. 2009, The University of Birmingham: Birmingham.

[2] Su, Y., T. Tian, and X. Song, Progressive Collapse Resistance of Axially-Restrained Frame Beams. ACI Structural Journal, 2009. 106-S55(September-October 2009).

DOI: 10.14359/51663100

[3] Ockleston, A.J., Load tests on a three storey reinforced concrete building in Johannesburg. Structural Engineer, 1955. 33(Oct): pp.304-322.

[4] Chattopadhyay, B., Compressive membrane action in reinforced concrete slabs. 1981, Polytechnic of Central London, PhD Thesis, December 1981: London.

[5] Park, R. and W.L. Gamble, Reinforced Concrete Slabs, 2nd ed. 2 ed. 2000, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[6] Braestrup, M.W., Dome effect in RC slabs: Rigid-plastic analysis. Journal of the Structural Division ASCE, 1980. 106(ST6): pp.1237-1253.

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0005445

[7] Rankin, G.I.B. and A.E. Long, Arching action strength enhancement in laterally-restrained slab strips. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 1997. 122(Nov.): p.461 – 467.

DOI: 10.1680/istbu.1997.29834

[8] Taylor, S.E., G.I.B. Rankin, and D.J. Cleland, Arching action in high-strength concrete slabs. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 2001. November(4): pp.353-362.

DOI: 10.1680/stbu.2001.146.4.353

[9] Lahlouh, E.H. and P. Waldron, Membrane action in one-way slab strips. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 1992. 94(Nov): pp.419-428.

DOI: 10.1680/istbu.1992.21505

[10] Smith, P.P., Robustness Assessment of Framed Buildings. Unpublished, 2011.