A Quick Level Methodology for the Volcanic Vulnerability Assessment of Buildings

Article Preview

Abstract:

Down the century, the volcanic eruptions have produced fatalities and economic losses. Today, almost half billion people and many conurbations (Tokyo, Mexico City, Yokohama, Seattle, Naples, etc.) are located in the proximity of very dangerous volcanoes. The volcanic risk mitigation of these areas requires a careful territorial planning together with an adequate knowledge of the behaviour of constructions under the eruption effects. The problem is very complex considering that a number of actions, such as ash fall, pyroclastic flows, flying fragments, volcanic earthquakes, lahars and tsunami, are produced by an eruptive event. Moreover, apart from the seismic case, the scientific literature relating to the structural volcanic vulnerability is poor. In this context, the paper illustrates a quick level methodology for the volcanic vulnerability assessment aimed at the identification of mitigation techniques. The ‘quick’ level, useful at territorial scale, is based on the identification of simple elements significant for the structures vulnerability. They are collected in a specific survey form, which adds to the information commonly required in case of the most familiar seismic vulnerability the ones specially related to all the volcano-induced phenomena. Then, the procedure furnishes a vulnerability index through the weighted combination of the vulnerability elements, according to the multi-criteria methods. The methodology proposed is a valuable tool that can be generally adopted in any kind of vulnerability investigation of buildings.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

639-644

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Information on http://www.vulcan.wr.usgs.gov. USGS, Cascades Volcano Observatory, Vancouver, Washington. (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] Unesco, Smithsonian Institution/SEAN, Global Volcanism Smithsonian Institution, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA. (1972).

Google Scholar

[3] Fournier d'Albe E.M., Objectives of Volcanic Monitoring and Prediction. Journ., Geol. Soc. Lond. 136, 321-326. (1979).

Google Scholar

[4] Mazzolani F.M., Faggiano B., De Gregorio D., Actions in the catastrophic scenarios of a volcanic eruption, Proc. of the Intern. Symposium Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events, Valletta, Malta, vol. 1, pp.449-467, ISBN/ISSN: 978-99909-44-40-2. (2008).

DOI: 10.1201/b10559

Google Scholar

[5] Mazzolan F.M., Faggiano B., De Gregorio D., The catastrophic scenario in explosive volcanic eruptions in urban areas, Proc. of the Intern. Confer. Protection of Historical Buildings, PROHITECH 09, Rome, Italy, Vol. 2: 1529-1534. ISBN: 978-0-415-55805-1. (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Mazzolani F.M., Indirli M., Zuccaro G., Faggiano B., Formisano A., De Gregorio, D., Catastrophic effects of a Vesuvian eruption on the built environment, Proc. of the Intern. Workshop Performance, Protection & Strengthening of Structures under Extreme Loading, PROTECT. (2009).

Google Scholar

[7] Mazzolani F.M., Faggiano B., Formisano A., De Gregorio D., Nunziata C., Mandara A., Volcanic and tectonic earthquakes effects in the Vesuvian urban habitat, Proc. of the European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 14th ECEE, Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, Paper n. 1179 on CD. ISBN 978-608-65185-1-6. (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Mazzolani F.M., Faggiano B., Formisano A., De Gregorio D., Vulnerability evaluation of RC structures in the Vesuvian area. Proc. of the Intern. Confer. Protection of Historical Buildings, PROHITECH 09, Rome, Italy, Vol. 2: 1523-1528. ISBN: 978-0-415-55805-1. (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] De Gregorio D., Faggiano B., Formisano A., Mazzolani F.M., Air fall deposits due to explosive eruptions: action model and robustness assessment of the Vesuvian roofs, Proceeding of the International Conference COST Action C26. Naples, Italy, 16-18 September 2010. pp: 507-512. ISBN 978-0-415-60685-1. (2010).

Google Scholar

[10] Zuccaro G. and Papa F., A Multimedial Handbook For Seismic Damage Evaluation And Post Event Macroseismic Assessment. European Seismic Conference, Genoa. (2002).

Google Scholar

[11] Zuccaro G., Cacace F., Spence R.J.S., Baxter P.J., Impact of explosive eruption scenarios at Vesuvius, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 178, 416–453. (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.01.005

Google Scholar

[12] DPCM, 2006, Prime Ministerial Decree 23 February 2006, Damage survey models on cultural heritage after catastrophic events, Model B, Official Gazette n.55, 7 March (2006).

Google Scholar

[13] Saaty T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw Hill. (1980).

Google Scholar

[14] Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag. (1981).

Google Scholar