Production, Injection and Flow of Petroleum with High Levels of CO2: Operational and Flow Assurance Aspects

Article Preview

Abstract:

Petroleum production always comes accompanied by some contaminants, including CO2. Recent pre-salt exploration in Brazil indicates significant carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration levels. Whereas in post-salt areas a ratio of 1 to 2% in CO2 concentration was observed, in the pre-salt area this molar ratio increased to 15 to 20% in relation to the gas phase, and were even higher in some cases. Several challenges have emerged in the production, treatment and disposal of oil with such high levels of CO2. The aim of this study is to show the management of CO2 in a pre-salt producing platform whose CO2 content is about 18% molar in the gas phase. The focus is on the operational aspects of daily production, where theoretical analyses are compared with the data observed in the field. Scenarios of production, injection, treatment and export are presented with emphasis on the aspects of flow assurance, the characterization of fluids, the integration of the injection-production-export system, and the dilution of CO2.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

78-84

Citation:

Online since:

March 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Mekala, J.S. Sangwai, Prediction of phase equilibrium of clathrate hydrates of multicomponent natural gases containing CO2 and H2S, J. of Petrol. Sci. and Engineering, v. 116, p.81–89, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.02.018

Google Scholar

[2] H. Lee, Y. Seo, S.P. Kang, S. Lee, Experimental measurements of hydrate phase equilibria for carbon dioxide in the presence of THF, propylene oxide, and 1, 4- dioxane, J. Chem. Eng. Data, v. 53 (12), p.2833–2837, (2008).

DOI: 10.1021/je800566y

Google Scholar

[3] F. Q. Li, J. Y. Liu, X. F. Zhang, J. X. Ren, J. Wu, The Effects of Operation Parameters on CO2 Removal Efficiency by Membrane Method, Advanced Materials Research, Vols 955-959, pp.2326-2329, (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.955-959.2326

Google Scholar

[4] E. T, Rufford, S. Smart, G.C.Y. Watson, B.F. Graham, J. Boxall, J.C.D. Costa, E. F. Maya, The removal of CO2 and N2 from natural gas: A review of conventional and emerging process technologies. J. of Petrol. Sci. and Engineering, v. 94-95, p.123–154, (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.06.016

Google Scholar

[5] G.C.Y. Watson, N. K Jensen, T. E Rufford, K.I. Chan, E.F. May, Volumetric adsorption measurements of N2, CO2, CH4, and a CO2 + CH4 mixture on a natural chabazite from 5 to 3000kPa. J. Chem. Eng. Data., v. 57(1), p.93–101, (2012).

DOI: 10.1021/je200812y

Google Scholar

[6] H. An, B. Feng, S. Su, CO2 capture by electro thermal swing adsorption with activated carbon fibre materials. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., v. 5, p.16–25, (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.007

Google Scholar

[7] J.D. Seader, E.J. Henley, Separation Process Principles. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, USA, (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] L. Meng, L.D. Connell, The transient behaviour of CO2 flow with phase transition in injection wells during geological storage – application to a case study. J. of Petrol. Sci. and Engineering, v. 124, p.7–18, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.09.024

Google Scholar

[9] H. Fatoorehchi, H. Abolghasemi, R. Rach, An accurate explicit form of the Hankinson –Thomas –Phillips correlation for prediction of the natural gas compressibility factor. J. of Petrol. Sci. and Engineering, v. 117, p.46–53, (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.03.004

Google Scholar

[10] A. M Elsharkawy, Efficient methods for calculation of compressibility, density and viscosity of natural gases. Fluid Phase Equil., v. 218, p.1–13, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2003.02.003

Google Scholar

[11] T. Ahmed, Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, (1989).

Google Scholar

[12] B. D Al-Anazi, G.R. Pazuki, M. Nikookar, A.F. Al-Anazi. The prediction of the compressibility factor of sour and natural gas by an artificial neural network system. Petrol. Sci. Technol., v. 29, p.325–336, (2011).

DOI: 10.1080/10916460903330080

Google Scholar

[13] B. Guo, W.C. Lyons, A. Ghalambor, Petroleum Production Engineering, a Computer-Assisted Approach. Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, MA, (2007).

Google Scholar

[14] R.W. Hankinson, L.K. Thomas, K. A Philips, Predict natural gas properties. Hydrocarb. Process., v. 48, p.106–108, (1969).

Google Scholar

[15] I. Andreolli, R. M. T. Heitmann, R.J. Dourado, T. Sanomya, Gas flow in subsea systems: Important aspects to be considered in the projects, Rio Oil & Gas Expo and Conference, 2010, (Portuguese).

Google Scholar

[16] I. Andreolli and L.A. Bernardo. Production, injection and flow of petroleum with high levels of CO2: operational aspects and flow assurance, 3rd Edition of the Brazilian Congress on CO2, 2015, (Portuguese).

Google Scholar