Period Formula for Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Infill Walls

Article Preview

Abstract:

The calculation of fundamental time period of vibration is a crucial step in seismic design and analysis of the structures to assess global response of the structure. Different international code proposed empirical expressions considering only height for bare frame structures and height and width of the buildings with infill to estimate the fundamental time period. This paper summaries the effect of the following parameters of building height, bay width, number of bays, cracked or un-cracked section of the structural member and support condition at the base on the fundamental time period of reinforced concrete bare frame and buildings with infill. Modal analysis of 360 building models with selected parameters is investigated in this study. A new equation, which is a function of the selected parameters (building height, bay width, number of bays, type of support condition, cracked or un-cracked sections and type of frame chosen for analysis) is also proposed using multiple linear regression analysis for predicting the fundamental period of buildings. The proposed simple model, including the building height, bay width, number of bays, type of support condition, cracked or un-cracked sections and type of frame chosen for analysis, showed better estimate in predicting the fundamental period of buildings compared to the code equations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

177-182

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] BIS, IS: 1893(2002): (Part 1), Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

Google Scholar

[2] Eurocode 8- Design of Structures for Earthquakes Resistance- Part 1: General Rules (2003), Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings.

DOI: 10.3403/03244372u

Google Scholar

[3] Uniform Building Code (1997), International conference of Building Official, Whittier, California.

Google Scholar

[4] ASCE (2006), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-05) American society of Civil Engineers Reston, Virginia.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784408094.err

Google Scholar

[5] M. M. Kose, Parameters affecting the fundamental period of R C buildings with infill walls, Engineering Structures. 31 (2009) 93-102.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.017

Google Scholar

[6] S. Varadharajan, V.K. Sehgal, B. Saini, Seismic Response of Building Frames with Vertical Setback and Stiffness Irregularity. Journal of structural engineering. Vol-I (2011) 52-61.

DOI: 10.1002/tal.1147

Google Scholar

[7] N. B. Hui, A. K. Banik, Advances in Dynamics, Vibration and Control, in: A. Banik, L. Halder, Parametric Study on Variation of Fundamental Time Period of RC Building with Vertical Irregularities, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, 2016, pp.139-144.

Google Scholar

[8] ASCE (2007), Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-06), American society of Civil Engineers Reston, Virginia.

DOI: 10.1061/9780784408841.sup

Google Scholar

[9] P. Haldar, Y. Sing, D. K. Paul, Identification of Seismic Failure Modes of URM Infilled RC Frame Buildings, J. Engineering Failure Analysis. 33 (2013) 97-118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.04.017

Google Scholar

[10] A.K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, third ed., Pearson Education, Chennai, (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] R.A. Johnson, I. Miller and J. Freund, Probability and Statistics for Engineers, eighth ed., Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, (2011).

Google Scholar