Experimental Study of Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Granite

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the SHPB (Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar), the dynamic mechanical properties of the granite in the borehole have been tested separately. The data shows that the impact dynamic strength increases as the precompression stress increases and can reach its maximum when the precompression stress is about 50% of the static tension strength. Meanwhile, the coupled static and dynamic strength increases as well, and it could reach about three times of the static precompression stress and one and half times of the dynamic strength respectively. Also, the failure model of the coupled static and dynamic loading is tension failure, which is the same as the static tension and conventional dynamic loading test.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

86-90

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. S. Paterson, T. F. Wong, Experimental rock deformation: the brittle field, 2nd ed. New York: Springer Verlag, (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Singh, Strength of rocks at depth, In: Maury V, Fourmaintrax D, eds. Rock at Great Depth. Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1989, 37-44.

Google Scholar

[3] S. NEMAT-NASSER, H. HORII, Rock failure in compression, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 22(8-10) (1984) 999-1011.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7225(84)90101-0

Google Scholar

[4] F. Dai, K. Xia, L. Z. Tang, Rate dependence of the flexural tensile strength of Laurentian granite, Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. Sci. Article in press, 47(3) (2009) 469-475.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.05.001

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Yu, J. X. Zhang, J. C. Zhang, A modified brazilian disk tension test, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 46 (2009) 421-425.

Google Scholar

[6] X. B. Li, Z. L. Zhou, T. S. Lok, et al. Innovative testing technique of rock subjected to coupled static and dynamic loads, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 45(5) (2008) 739-748.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.08.013

Google Scholar

[7] X. B. Li, Z. L. Zhou, Z. Y. Ye, et al. Study of rock mechanical characteristics under coupled static and dynamic loads, Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 27(7) (2008) 1387-1395. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Golshani, Aliakbar, Y. Okui, et al. A micromechanical model for brittle failure of rock and its relation to crack growth observed in triaxial compression tests of granite, Mech. Mater. 38(4) (2006) 287-303.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.07.003

Google Scholar

[9] H. B. Li, J. Zhao, T. J. Li, Micromechanical modeling of the mechanical properties of a granite under dynamic uniaxial compressive loads, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 37(6) (2000) 923-935.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(00)00025-3

Google Scholar

[10] H. Zhao, G. Gary, On the use of SHPB techniques to determine the dynamic behavior of materials in the range of small strains, Int. J. Solids Struct. 33(23) (1996) 3363-3375.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00186-7

Google Scholar

[11] X. B. Li, D. S. Gu, Rock impact dynamics, Changsha: Press of Central South University of Technology, 1994. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Z. X. Zhang, An empirical relation between mode I fracture toughness and the tensile strength of rock, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39(3) (2002) 401-406.

DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(02)00032-1

Google Scholar