Effect of Strain Rate on Tension Response of Filled Silicone Rubber

Article Preview

Abstract:

Uniaxial tension tests for filled silicone rubber were performed at high strain rates using a split Hopkinson tension bar system. Quasi-static tension tests were carried out using an Instron-E3000 material test system. The grip fixture was designed to reliably connect the tensile specimen with the incident/transmitted bars. The method to increase the signal-noise ratio of the stress pulse in the transmitted bar was proposed. The effect of specimen gage length-to-width ratio on the stress-strain responses was experimentally studied. The suitable specimen geometry was determined by means of experimental investigation and finite element analysis. The automated grid method was used to capture the deformation information of the tensile specimen. Experiments indicate that the tension responses of silicone rubber exhibit the apparent hyper-elastic and rate-dependent characteristics. The values of tensile modulus increase with the increase of strain rate. The stress at a given elongation increases with the increase of strain rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

112-116

Citation:

Online since:

February 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Meunier, G. Chagnon, D. Favier, L. Orgéas, P. Vacher, Mechanical experimental characterization and numerical modeling of an unfilled silicone rubber, Polym. Test. 27 (2008) 765-777.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.05.011

Google Scholar

[2] G. Machado, G. Chagnon, D. Favier, Induced anisotropy by the Mullins effect in filled silicone rubber, Mech. Mater. 50 (2012) 70-80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.03.006

Google Scholar

[3] L. M. Yang, V. P. W. Shim, C. T. Lim, A visco-hyperelastic approach to modeling the constitutive behavior of rubber, Int. J. Impact Eng. 24(6-7) (2000) 545-560.

DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(99)00044-5

Google Scholar

[4] O. A. Shergold, N. A. Fleck, D. Radford, The uniaxial stress versus strain response of pig skin and silicone rubber at low and high strain rates, Int. J. Impact Eng. 32(9) (2006) 1384-1402.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.11.010

Google Scholar

[5] M. Cheng, W. N. Chen, Experimental investigation of the stress–stretch behavior of EPDM rubber with loading rate effects, Int. J. Solids Struct. 40(18) (2003) 4749-4768.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(03)00182-3

Google Scholar

[6] Y. M. Xia, Y. Wang, Dynamic testing of materials with the rotating disk indirect bar-bar tensile impact apparatus, J. Test. Evaluat. 35(1) (2007) 31-35.

DOI: 10.1520/jte12436j

Google Scholar

[7] J. S. Sirkis, T. J. Lim, Displacement and strain measurement with automated grid methods, Experiment. Mech. 31(4) (1991) 382-388.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02325997

Google Scholar