Relation between Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Physical Parameters of Rock in a Nuclear Power Plant

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to improve the accuracy of the selection on rock mechanical parameters, the relation between uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and physical mechanical parameters should be investigated. A great number of physical and mechanical tests on rock in the first-stage of Guangxi Fangchenggang Nuclear Power Plant (GFNPP) are conducted. Mineral identification tests of rocks are conducted, and rocks are divided into two groups (A and B) according to the result of the test. The correlation coefficient between rock UCS and rock physical parameters (porosity, density and P-wave velocity) are calculated by using Pearson’s analytical method. The result shows that the relationship between physical parameters and mechanical parameters of rock is influenced significantly by content of quartz. Regression analysis method is used to explore the relation between UCS and porosity, density, P-wave velocity of rock; combined with the dimensional analysis, the relation between UCS and rock physical parameters was established. Based on normality test and randomness test, the best fitting equation is determined as the empirical equation of UCS. The empirical equation was used to forecast the UCS of rock in the second-stage of GFNPP, comparative results show that the forecasting value and the experimental value are in good agreement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

373-382

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. M. An, Q. Y. Yang, L. J. Yang, et al. Comparison between static and dynamic elastic moduli of rock mass in a nuclear power plant, Rock Soil Mechan. 32(s1) (2011) 565-569.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Q. You, C. D. Su, Effect of length of fine and coarse crystal marble specimens on uniaxial compression tests, Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 23(22) (2004) 3754-3760.

Google Scholar

[3] S. J. Yang, H. Zeng, H. L. Wang, Experimental analysis on mechanical effescts of loading rates on limestone, Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 27(7) (2005) 786-788.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Yang, L. Yuan, L. G. Qi, et al. Establishing predictive model for rock uniaxial compressive strength of No. 11-2 coal seam roof in Huainan mining area, Chin. J. Rock Soil Mech. Eng. 32(10) (2013) 1991-(1998).

Google Scholar

[5] Per Horsrud, Estimating mechanical properties of shale from empirical correlations, SPE Drill. Complet. 16(02) (2001) 68-73.

DOI: 10.2118/56017-pa

Google Scholar

[6] C. D. Chang, M. D. Zoback, A. Khaksar, Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 51(3-4) (2006) 223-237.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003

Google Scholar

[7] Z. R. Meng, J. C. Zhang, T. Joachim, Relationship between physical and mechanical parameters and acoustic wave velocity of coal measures rocks, Chin. J. Geophys. 49(5) (2006) 1505-1510.

DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.959

Google Scholar

[8] J. Jiang, J. Z. Sun, Y. H. Qiao, X. S. Yang, Comparison between static and dynamic parameters of grand buddha rockmass specimens in west JinYang mountain in TaiYuan, Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 26(s1) (2007) 3452-3460.

Google Scholar

[9] S. M. LIU, L. H. Xu, Y. Q. Li, Experimental study on rock physical and mechanical properties in Danjiangkou reservoir area, J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. (Urban Science Edition), 24(4) (2007) 54-58.

Google Scholar

[10] J. F. Jin, X. B. Li, Z. Q. Yin, Realationship between physical parameters and acoustic wave velocity of dacite porphyry, Min. R&D, 31(2) (2011) 15-17.

Google Scholar

[11] Evert Hoek, Edwin T Brown. Underground excavations in rock, (1980).

Google Scholar

[12] P. B. Robert, F. Amann, P. K. Kaiser, et al. Interpretation of UCS test results for engineering design, 13th ISRM International Congress of Rock Mechanics, (2015).

Google Scholar

[13] Isrm Suggested Methods. Rock characterization testing and monitoring. Pergamon Press, Oxford; 1981. pp.113-116.

Google Scholar

[14] Astm. Standard Test Method for Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens in Uniaxial Compression. ASTM Stand0408(D3148)(1993).

DOI: 10.1520/d3148-96

Google Scholar

[15] W. R. Dearman, F. J. Baynes, T. Y. Irfan, Engineering grading of weathered granite, Eng. Geol. 12 (1978) 345-374.

DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(78)90018-2

Google Scholar

[16] A. Tuǧrul, The effect of weathering on pore geometry and compressive strength of selected rock types from Turkey, Eng. Geol. 75(3) (2004) 215-227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.05.008

Google Scholar

[17] L. Vernik, M. Bruno, C. Bovberg, Empirical relations between compressive strength and porosity of siliciclastic rocks, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 30(7) (1993) 677-680.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(93)90004-w

Google Scholar

[18] H. J. David, M. N. Toksöz, Ultrasonic P and S wave attenuation in dry and saturated rocks under pressure, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 85(B2) (1980) 925-936.

DOI: 10.1029/jb085ib02p00925

Google Scholar

[19] E. I. Mashinskii, Variants of the strain-amplitude dependence of elastic wave velocities in rocks under pressure, J. Geophys. Eng. 1(4) (2004) 295.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/1/4/008

Google Scholar