Dynamic Modeling and Complexity Analysis of Human Lower Limb under Various Speeds

Article Preview

Abstract:

Human lower limbs are the most important parts of human body due to their supporting the whole body in the process of human motions. There are many pathological joint diseases and accidental damage, such as traffic accident and falling off from high place, influencing the human daily life seriously. Therefore, dynamic model of human lower limb has received considerable interest from multi-disciplines including flexible mechanisms, smart structures, biomechanics and nonlinear dynamics. This paper establishes the simplified simulation model of human lower limb based on the acquired realistic data from human motions under different speeds. The model can not only describe dynamic characteristics of real lower limb but also can be simulated by realistic human lower limb motion excitation acquired by tri-axial accelerometers and inclinometers in different conditions. Consequently, the detailed dynamic information of human lower limb from the proposed model can be obtained. In order to analyze the variability of human motions, multiscale entropy (MSE) is employed to investigate the complexity of human motion signals for different speeds of motion. Motion transition characteristics under different speeds are exhibited for understanding adaptation mechanism of human motion. The results will be helpful for exoskeleton and lower limb rehabilitation robot.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

212-217

Citation:

Online since:

July 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.A. Winter, Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effects, J. Human Movement Science. 3(1-2) (1984) 51-76.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-9457(84)90005-8

Google Scholar

[2] B.L. Webber, C.B. Phillips, N.I. Badler, Simulating Humans: Computer Graphics, Animation and Control, Oxford University Press, New York, (1993).

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195073591.001.0001

Google Scholar

[3] F.C. Anderson, M.G. Pandy, Dynamic optimization of human walking, J. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 123 (2001) 381-390.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1392310

Google Scholar

[4] E.M. Arnold, S.R. Ward, R.L. Lieber, S.L. Delp, A model of the lower limb for analysis of human movement, J. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 38(2) (2010) 269-279.

DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9852-5

Google Scholar

[5] J. Apkarian, S. Naumann, B. Cairns, A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb, J. Journal of Biomechanics. 22(2) (1989) 143-155.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90037-7

Google Scholar

[6] S. Pejhan, F. Farahmand, M. Parnianpour, Design optimization of an above-knee prosthesis based on the kinematics of gait, C. 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference Proceedings, 2008, pp.4274-4277.

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2008.4650154

Google Scholar

[7] M. Costa, A.L. Goldberger, C.K. Peng, Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series, J. Physical Review Letters. 89(6) (2002) 8102(1-4).

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.89.068102

Google Scholar

[8] M. Costa, C.K. Peng, A.L. Goldberger, J.M. Hausdorff, Multiscale entropy analysis of human gait dynamics, J. Physica A. 330 (2003) 53-60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2003.08.022

Google Scholar

[9] M. Costa, A.L. Goldberger, C.K. Peng, Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals, J. Physical Review E. 71(2) (2005) 1906(1-18).

Google Scholar

[10] R. Istenic, P.A. Kaplanis, C.S. Pattichis, D. Zazula, Multiscale entropy-based approach to automated surface EMG classification of neuromuscular disorders, J. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 48 (2010) 773-781.

DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0629-7

Google Scholar

[11] A. Catarino, O. Churches, S.B. Cohen, A. Andrade, H. Ring, A typical EEG complexity in autism spectrum conditions: A multiscale entropy analysis, J. Clinical Neurophysiology. 122 (2011) 2375-2383.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.004

Google Scholar

[12] S.J. McGregor, E. Bollt, Control entropy: What is it and what does it tell us? J. Clinical Kinesiology. 66(1) (2012) 7-12.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Vimieiro, E. Andrada, H. Witte, M. Pinotti, A computational model for dynamic analysis of the human gait, J. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. 18(7) (2015) 799-804.

DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2013.848859

Google Scholar

[14] S.M. Pincus, Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity, J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88(6) (1991) 2297-2301.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297

Google Scholar

[15] J.S. Richman, J.R. Moorman, Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy, J. Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 278(6) (2000) 2039-(2049).

DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.h2039

Google Scholar

[16] S.M. Pincus, Assessing serial irregularity and its implications for health, J. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 954 (2001), 245-267.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb02755.x

Google Scholar

[17] A.L. Goldberger, C.K. Peng, L.A. Lipsitz, What is physiologic complexity and how does it change with aging and disease? J. Neurobiology of Aging. 23 (2002) 23-26.

DOI: 10.1016/s0197-4580(01)00266-4

Google Scholar