Film Cooling Performances at Different Turbulence Intensities Using Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study presents a numerical investigation of cooling performances of a modified vane of the film-cooled vane reported by Timko (NASA CR-168289) at different mainstream turbulence intensities (Tus). A 3D conjugate heat transfer (CHT) analysis with SST k-ω turbulence model in FLUENT V.15 is used. Three different mechanisms in CHT analysis, i.e. fluid flow, heat convection between solid surfaces and flowing fluid in an external mainstream and internal cooling passages, and heat conduction within the vane structure, are simultaneously considered. Numerical results are conducted in terms of overall cooling effectiveness at Tu=3.3, 10, and 20%. Comparison between overall cooling effectiveness and film effectiveness under adiabatic assumption is discussed at the three Tus, also. The findings of this research indicate the following phenomena: 1) overall cooling effectiveness decreases with Tu, and this effect on the pressure side (PS) is stronger than that on the suction side (SS) in general. 2) By comparison with adiabatic film effectiveness, the level of overall cooling effectiveness in most regions is higher and more uniform than that of adiabatic film effectiveness for all three Tus. 3) In the leading edge (LE), when Tu increases, near the exits of film holes overall cooling effectiveness deteriorates, but adiabatic film effectiveness improves. Furthermore, a large area with relatively low overall cooling effectiveness is able to move with Tu in the LE region.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

271-278

Citation:

Online since:

October 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. H. Ni, W. Humber, G. Fan, P. D. Johnson, J. Downs, J. P. Clark, J. P. Koch, Conjugate heat transfer analysis of a film-cooled turbine vane, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2011: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, (2011).

DOI: 10.1115/gt2011-45920

Google Scholar

[2] R. H. Ni, W. Humber, G. Fan, J. P. Clark, R. J. Anthony, J. J. Johnson, Comparison of prediction from conjugate heat transfer analysis of a film-cooled turbine vane to experimental data, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, (2013).

DOI: 10.1115/gt2013-94716

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Mazur, A. Herna´ndez-Rossette, R. Garcı´a-Illescas, A. Luna-Ramı´rez, Analysis of conjugate heat transfer of a gas turbine first stage nozzle, Appl. Therm. Eng. 26 (2006) 1796–1806.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.01.025

Google Scholar

[4] Q. B. Zhang, H. Z. Xu, J. H. Wang, G. Li, L. Wang, X. Y. Wu, S. Y. Ma, Evaluation of CFD predictions using different turbulence models on a film cooled guide vane under experimental conditions, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, (2015).

DOI: 10.1115/gt2015-42563

Google Scholar

[5] J. Luo, E. H. Razinsky, Conjugate heat transfer analysis of a cooled turbine vane using the V2F turbulence model, ASME J. Turbomach. 129 (2007) 773-781.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2720483

Google Scholar

[6] M. Alizadeh, A. Izadi, A. Fathi, Sensitivity analysis on turbine blade temperature distribution using conjugate heat transfer simulation, ASME J. Turbomach. 136 (2014) 011001.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4024637

Google Scholar

[7] S. V. Ekkad, H. Du, J. C. Han, Local heat transfer coefficient and film effectiveness distributions on a cylindrical leading edge model using a transient liquid crystal image method, J. Flow Visual. Image Proc. 3 (1996) 129-140.

DOI: 10.1615/jflowvisimageproc.v3.i2-3.20

Google Scholar

[8] K. A. Thole, R. W. Radomsky, M. B. Kang, A. Kohli, Elevated freestream turbulence effects on heat transfer for a gas turbine vane, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 23 (2002) 137–147.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-727x(01)00145-x

Google Scholar

[9] L. P. Timko, Energy efficient engine high pressure turbine component test performance report, NASA report, NASA Lewis Res. Center, (1984) NASA CR-168289.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Prapamonthon, H. Z. Xu, J. H. Wang, G. Li, Predicting adiabatic film effectiveness of a turbine vane by two-equation turbulence models, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, (2015).

DOI: 10.1115/gt2015-42565

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Q. Ke, Wang, J. H, Numerical investigations of pulsed film cooling on an entire turbine vane, Appl. Therm. Eng. 87 (2015) 117-126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.022

Google Scholar

[12] T. I. P. Shih, Y. L. Lin, Controlling secondary-flow structure by leading-edge airfoil fillet and inlet swirl to reduce aerodynamic loss and surface heat transfer, ASME J. Turbomach. 125 (2003) 48-56.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1518503

Google Scholar

[13] P. Prapamonthon, H. Z. Xu, W. S. Yang, J. H. Wang, Numerical study of the effects of thermal barrier coating and turbulence intensity on cooling performances of a nozzle guide vane. Energies, 10(3) (2017) 362.

DOI: 10.3390/en10030362

Google Scholar