Study Computational Simulation and Experimental of Butt-Joint by Visual-Weld Software and MIG Welding Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to present the simulation and experiment of the welding butt-joint aluminum alloys to low carbon steel using Visual-weld software and the metal inert gas (MIG) welding process. The workpiece is set up in a virtual environment with an area of 150 x 70 x 5 mm, a welding speed at 3.5 mm/s, and a heating source of 2.5 kW. The finite element method (FEM) is used as a powerful tool in simulating, calculating and predicting the welding stress and distortion at the early stage of the design process and development of welding products. The metallurgical process, deformation, hardness, etc. are investigated using the FEM in Sysweld software. The microstructure of the intermetallic layer is observed using scanning electron microscopy. The hardness of the intermetallic layer is examined using Vickers hardness testing. Tensile strength and bending strength are examined by tensile and compress multimeter equipment. To improve the quality of the aluminum/steel welds, the IMCs layer should be as small as possible. The experimental results are better if the welding current of range of 95 – 100 A and the welding speed is from 3.5 to 4 mm/s.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

161-167

Citation:

Online since:

March 2019

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.F. Tu, A.G. Paleocrassas, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 211 (2011) 95-102.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Xua, J. Liu, G. Luan, C. Dong, Materials and Design. 30 (2009) 1886-1893.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Sierra, P. Peyre, F. D. Beaume, D. Stuart, G. Fras, Materials Science and Engineering A. 447 (2007) 197-208.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.106

Google Scholar

[4] K. Kimapong and T. Watanabe, Materials Transactions. 46 (2005) 835-841.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Ito, T. Okuda, R. Ueji, H. Fujii, C. Shiga, Materials and Design. 61 (2014) 275-280.

Google Scholar

[6] J. S. Shih, Y. F. Tzeng, Y. F. Lin and J. B. Yang, Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing. 6 (2012) 222-235.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Hangai and M. Saito, Materials Transactions. 54 (2013) 1012-1017.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Taban, J. E. Gould, J. C. Lippold, Materials and Design. 31 (2010) 2305-2311.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Kobayashi, T. Yakou, Materials Science and Engineering A. 338 (2002) 44-53.

Google Scholar

[10] Katashi Miyagawa, Masami Tsubaki, Toshiaki Yasui & Masahiro Fukumoto. Welding International. 23 (2009) 559–564.

Google Scholar

[11] TakehikoWatanabe, Hideo Sakuyama, Atsushi Yanagisawa. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 5475–5480.

Google Scholar

[12] Quoc Manh Nguyen and Shyh-Chour Huang. Materials 8, (2015), 8246–8254.

Google Scholar

[13] Van Nhat Nguyen, Quoc Manh Nguyen, Huong Thao Dang Thi, Shyh-Chour Huang. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Innovation IEEE-ICASI 2017 - Meen, Prior & Lam (Eds) 1550-1553.

Google Scholar

[14] Van Nhat Nguyen, Quoc-Manh Nguyen, Shyh-Chour Huang. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Materials for Science and Engineering IEEE-ICAMSE 2016 - Meen, Prior & Lam (Eds) 151-154.

Google Scholar