Three-Dimensional Modeling and Finite Element Analysis of an Ankle External Fixator

Abstract:

External fixator has played an important role in repairing fractured ankle bone. This surgery is done due to the several factors which are the bone is not normal position or has broken into several pieces. The external fixator will help the broken bone to grow and remodel back to the original appearance. However, there are some issues regarding to the stability of this fixation. Improper design and material are the major factor that decreased the stability since it is related to the deformation of the external fixator to hold the bone fracture area. This study aims to design a stable structure for constructing delta frame ankle external fixator to increase the stability of the fixation. There are two designs of external fixator with two types of material used in this present study. Both external fixators with different materials are analyzed in terms of von Mises stress and deformation by using a conventional Finite Element Analysis software; ANSYS Workbench V15. The result obtained shows the Model 1 with stainless steel has less stress and deformation distributions compared to the Model 2. Hence, by using Model 1 as the external fixator, the stability of the fixation can be increased.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 899)
• Pages: 94-102
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.899.94
• Online since: June 2020
• Authors: Nur Faiqa Ismail*, Muhammmad Aiman Firdaus Bin Adnan, Solehuddin Shuib, Nik Ahmad Hambali Nik Abd Rashid
• Keywords: Ankle Fracture, External Fixator, Finite Element Analysis

References

[1] D. B. Bruce (2009) Skeletal trauma: basic science, management and reconstruction volume 1. Res 19:448–455.

[2] Egol K, Tejwani N, Capla E et al (2005) Staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures (OTA types 41): the results of a prospective, standardized protocol. J Orthop Trauma 19:448–455.

DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000171881.11205.80

[3] Gerald W. Paul (2003) Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery: The history of external fixation. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 20:1-8.

[4] Aro HT, Chao EY (1993) Bone-healing patterns affected by loading, fracture fragment stability, fracture type, and fracture site compression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 293:8–17.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199308000-00003

[5] Nakamura, S., Crowninshield, R. D., & Cooper, R. R. (1980). An analysis of soft tissue loading in the foot--a preliminary report. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research, 10, 27-34.

[6] Topliss, C. J., Jackson, M., & Atkins, R. M. (2005). Anatomy of pilon fractures of the distal tibia. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, 87(5), 692-697.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b5.15982

[7] Kapukaya, A., Subasi, M., Arslan, H., & Tuzuner, T. (2005). Non-reducible, open tibial plafond fractures treated with a circular external fixator (is the current classification sufficient for identifying fractures in this area?). Injury,36(12), 1480-1487.

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.05.005

[8] Bartolozzi, P., & Lavini, F. (2004). Fractures of the tibial pilon. Springer Science & Business Media.

[9] Giotakis, N., & Narayan, B. (2007). Stability with unilateral external fixation in the tibia. Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 2(1), 13–20.

DOI: 10.1007/s11751-007-0011-y

[10] Hans K. U. (2012) Current concepts of external fixation of fractures. Med Surg 114-130.

[11] Behrens F, Johnson W (1989) Unilateral external fixation meth-20 ods to increase and reduce frame stiffness. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241:48–56.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198904000-00007

[12] Heintz, S., & Gutierrez-Farewik, E. M. (2007). Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach. Gait & posture, 26(2), 279-288.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.074