Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Segmented Porous Implant Fabricated by 3D Printing and CNC Composite Machining Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to design porous implants with particular structure and evaluate their biomechanical behavior. Thus, a segmented porous dental implant (SPDI) was designed and manufactured by 3D Printing and computer numerical control (CNC) composite machining technology. The FE analysis was used to investigate its static mechanical property. Fatigue test was performed to verify its fatigue life. Resonance frequency analysis and pull-out tests were carried out to study its primary stability. Results indicated that better stress distribution was observed for SPDI. Fatigue test showed that no fracture or failure occurred in SPDI samples after 8 million cycles. The average implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of the SPDI inserted into the porous and denser artificial bones were 68.7 and 73.0 respectively. The average maximum pull-out force of SPDI extracted from the artificial bones was 347.5 N. This study provided a new structural design and manufacturing method for porous implant. The results suggested that the novel porous implant obtained good mechanical adaptability and primary stability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

45-53

Citation:

Online since:

September 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Degerliyurt K, Simsek B, Erkmen E, et al. Effects of different fixture geometries on the stress distribution in mandibular peri-implant structures: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontology.110 (2010) e1-e11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.029

Google Scholar

[2] Kim D G, Jeong Y H, Chien H H. Immediate mechanical stability of threaded and porous implant systems. Clinical Biomechanics. 48 (2017) 110-117.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.08.001

Google Scholar

[3] Lee C C, Lin S C, Kang M J. Effects of implant threads on the contact area and stress distribution of marginal bone. Journal of Dental Sciences. (5) 2010 156-165.

DOI: 10.1016/s1991-7902(10)60023-2

Google Scholar

[4] Steigenga JT, al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dentistry (12) 2003 306-317.

DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000091140.76130.a1

Google Scholar

[5] Freitas-Júnior, Amilcar, C., Rocha, E.P., Bonfante, E.A., Almeida, E.O., Anchieta, R. B., Martini, A.P. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dental Material. (28) 2012 e218-228.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004

Google Scholar

[6] Bobyn J D, Stackpool G J, Hacking S A. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. The Bone & Joint Journal. (81) 1999 907-914.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b5.0810907

Google Scholar

[7] Edelmann A R, Patel D, Allen R K. Retrospective analysis of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. (121) 2019 404-410.

DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.022

Google Scholar

[8] Bencharit S, Byrd W C, Altarawneh S. Development and Applications of Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metal-Enhanced Titanium Dental Implants. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. (16) 2014 817-826.

DOI: 10.1111/cid.12059

Google Scholar

[9] Vaillancourt, H., Pilliar, R.M., Mccammond, D. Factors Affecting Crestal Bone Loss With Dental Implants Partially Covered With a Porous Coating: A Finite Element Analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. (11) 1996 351-359.

DOI: 10.1002/jab.770060408

Google Scholar

[10] Sato, Y., Wadamoto, M., Tsuga, K., Teixeira, E.R., 1999.The effectiveness of elemant downsizlng on a three-dimensional finite element model of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanies. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. (26) 1999 288–291.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00390.x

Google Scholar

[11] Han W, Kexin S, Leizheng S. The effect of 3D-printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds with various macropore structures on osteointegration and osteogenesis: A biomechanical evaluation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. (88) 2018 488-496.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.049

Google Scholar

[12] Hajimiragha H, Abolbashari M, Nokar S. Bone Response From a Dynamic Stimulus on a One-Piece and Multi-Piece Implant Abutment and Crown by Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Oral Implantology. (40) 2014 525-532.

DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-10-00170

Google Scholar

[13] Brosh T, Pilo R, Sudai D. The influence of abutment angulation on strains and stresses along the implant/bone interface: comparison between two experimental techniques. J Prosthet Dent. (79) 1998 328–334.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70246-x

Google Scholar

[14] Ha S.R, Kim S.H, Lee J.B. Effects of coping designs on stress distributions in zirconia crowns: Finite element analysis. Ceramics International. (42) 2016 4932-4940.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.007

Google Scholar

[15] Da, S.N.J.P., Jardim, P.M., Neves Flávio Domingues das, Xediek, C.R.L., Dos, S.M.B.F. Stress analysis of different configurations of 3 implants to support a fixed prosthesis in an edentulous jaw. Braz Oral Res. (28) 2014 67-73.

DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242013005000028

Google Scholar

[16] Dong, W., Kebin, T., Jiang, C., Hua, J., Wenxiu, H., Yuyu, L. A further finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. (2015) 2015 1-9.

DOI: 10.1155/2015/560645

Google Scholar

[17] Chun H J, Cheong S Y, Han J H, Heo S J. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. (29) 2002 565-574.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00891.x

Google Scholar

[18] Holmgren E P, Seckinger R J, Kilgren L M, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis—a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J. Oral Implantol. (24) 1998 80-88.

DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:epoodi>2.3.co;2

Google Scholar

[19] Bordin D, Bergamo E T P, Fardin V P. Fracture strength and probability of survival of narrow and extra-narrow dental implants after fatigue testing:,In vitro, and, in silico, analysis. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. (71) 2017 244-249.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.022

Google Scholar

[20] Freitas-Júnior, Amilcar C, Rocha E P, Bonfante E A. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dental Materials. (28) 2012 218-228.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004

Google Scholar