Dynamic Assessment Model of Construction Safety Management Based on SPA and Markov Chain

Article Preview

Abstract:

the set pair analysis method that deal with uncertain problem of system and Markov chain theory that research the transition law of system state was appled to establish the dynamic assessment model for safety management of bridge construction. Taking a bridge construction project as an example, this paper conduct a dynamic assessment through five time intervals and come to a conclusion that the assessment results are general and they need rectification, but the system state is developing into a favourable level. And the evaluate results verify the rationality of the model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2345-2349

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] SU Yi-kun; ZHANG Shou-jian; SUN San-long. Journal of Jiamusi University(Natural Science Edition),, 2003, 21(4): 383(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] LIU Ye-jiao1; TIAN Zhi-chao; LIU Jin-cai. Coal Engineering, 2009,(11): 119-120(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Aneziris O N, Papazoglou l A, Lygerou V. Journal of Lass Prevention in the Process Industries, 2000, 13(2): 153-165

Google Scholar

[4] Zhao Lifeng, Zhao Keqin. The theories, methods and its applications of set pair analysis, system science and it's applications. Tianjin: Peoples'Publishing House, 1998, 61-64(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Curnow R N.Theor Biol, 1988, 134: 51-57

Google Scholar

[6] SONG Lianjun; XU Zhiyong. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2009,29(12): 38-39(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] ZHOU Jia-hong XU Kai-li CHEN Zhi-yong. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2008,29(3): 417-419(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Randall S. Harper and Enno Koehn. Journal of Construction Engineering and Managemeng, 1998, (6): 452-457

Google Scholar

[9] Joe M.Wilson Jr, Enno Koehn. Journal of Construction Engineering and Managemeng, 2000, 126(1): 77-79

Google Scholar