The Environmental and Energy Potential of Incinerating Various Biomass Mixtures

Article Preview

Abstract:

In recent years, research has shown the advisability of seeking new types of biofuel. It has been shown that apart from one-component fuel, it is also advisable to use mixtures composed of basic raw materials. These mixtures may have a favourable effect upon the overall recovery of such fuels. This paper focuses upon options for the energy use of various mixtures of biomass waste. Biomass waste originates from primary agricultural production and countryside maintenance. This mainly consists of plant residues, i.e. straw and hay. Pellets were made using the given biomass. The pellets were prepared by mixing plant residues with spruce shavings as well as from pure materials, i.e. wheat straw, hay and sawdust. Individual types of biomass were mixed in various ratios: 50% wheat straw + 50% hay, 50% wheat straw + 50% sawdust, 50% hay + 50% sawdust, 33% wheat straw + 33% hay + 33% sawdust. The following basic parameters of the prepared samples were monitored: humidity, calorific value and ash content. These parameters influence the environmental as well as economic aspects of options for using these plant residues as fuel. It was discovered during the tests that the highest calorific value was achieved using a sample of biomass prepared by mixing 50% straw and 50% hay. The highest humidity was found in a sample of sawdust and the highest ash content in a sample prepared by mixing 50% straw and 50% hay.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

114-117

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on http: /www. npsr. sk.

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http: /www. abe. sk/dokumenty/Akcny_plan. pdf.

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http: /www. agrobiomasa. sk.

Google Scholar

[4] M.M. Roy, A. Dutta, K. Corscadden: Appl Energ Vol. 108 (2013), p.298–307.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Sultana, A. Kumar: Biomass and bioenergy Vol. 39 (2012), pp.344-355.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Olt, M. Laur in: Engineering for Rural Development. Jelgava, 28. -29. 05. (2009).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Martinka, T. Chrebet, I. Hrušovský, K. Balog: European Journal of Environmental and Safety Sciences Vol. 1 (2013), pp.24-31.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Xu, M. Zachar, A. Majlingová, C. Jin, Y. Jiang: European Journal of Environmental and Safety Sciences Vol. 1 (2013), pp.1-7.

Google Scholar

[9] E. Hroncová, J. Ladomerský, J. Puskajler: European Journal of Environmental and Safety Sciences Vol. 2 (2014), in press.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Kalinauskaitė, A. Sakalauskas, E. Šarauskis, A. Jasinskas, M.: Agronomy Research Vol. 11(2) (2013), p.319–328.

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. tzb-info. cz.

Google Scholar

[12] L. Dzurenda in: Spaľovanie dreva a kôry (Burning wood and bark). Technical university in Zvolen (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] K. Srdečný, J. Truxa, F. Macholda, J. Beranovský, L. Hudecová in: Infolisty o obnosviteľných zdorjích energie (Infolists on renewable energy). EkoWATT Praha (2007).

Google Scholar

[14] Information on http: /www. eis. cz/problematika. php?klic=3/4.

Google Scholar