Study on the Alignment of New Product Development and Supply Chain

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the review of related literature about the alignment of new product development (NPD) and supply chain (SC), the related decision variables of NPD and SC are summarized. In order to explore the alignment relationship between NDP and SC, we propose a study framework and the some relationship assumptions. Taking use of questionnaire investigation and Structural Equation Modeling, the relevant assumptions are verified and the mechanism and strategy of the alignment of NPD and SC are explored for Chinese manufacturing enterprises. The research result shows that the modularity and variety of NPD have close relationship with the complexity of supply chain configuration, collaboration and coordination. And the degree of the alignment has an important influence on the supply chain performance of the end product. The relevant conclusions would provide some theoretical reference and practical guidance on the decision of aligning the NPD with SC.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1006-1007)

Pages:

556-565

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Niezen, C. and Weller. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84, (9), 22.

Google Scholar

[2] Fisher, M.L. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 75 (2), 105-106.

Google Scholar

[3] Randall, T., Ulrich, K. Product variety. Management Science, 2001(12), 588-604.

Google Scholar

[4] Paul Childerhouse, James Aitken, Denis R. Towill. Journal of Operations Management, 2002, 20, (6), 675-689.

Google Scholar

[5] Lamming, R., Johnsen, T., Zheng, J. and Harland, C. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2000, 20(6), 675-691.

DOI: 10.1108/01443570010321667

Google Scholar

[6] Christopher, M., Towill, D.R. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2000, 13(1), 1-14.

Google Scholar

[7] Christopher, M., Peck, H., Towill, D. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2006, 17(2), 277-287.

Google Scholar

[8] Lee, H.L. California Management Review, 2002, 44(3), 105-119.

Google Scholar

[9] Van Hoek, R., Chapman, P. Supply Chain Management, 2006, 11(5), 385-389.

Google Scholar

[10] Droge,C., Vickery S.K., Jacobs M.A. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 137, 250-262.

Google Scholar

[11] Ellram, L.M., Stanley L.L. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2008, 14(3), 180-191.

Google Scholar

[12] Forza,C., Salvador,F., Rungtusanatham,M. Journal of Operations Management, 2005, 23(3–4), 319-324.

Google Scholar

[13] Park Y.W., Ogawa,K., Tatsumoto,H., Hong,P. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 2009, 5(6), 787-798.

Google Scholar

[14] Krishnan,V., Ulrich,K. Management Science, 2001, 47(1), 1-21.

Google Scholar

[15] Fixson, S.K., Park, J-K. Research Policy, 2008, 37(8), 1296–1316.

Google Scholar

[16] Fixson, S.K. Journal of Operations Management, 2005, 23(3), 345-369.

Google Scholar

[17] Sharifi, H. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2006, 17(8), 1078-1098.

Google Scholar

[18] Ulrich, K. Research Policy, 1995, 24(3), 419-440.

Google Scholar

[19] Baldwin, C.Y. , Clark, K.B. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 75(9), 84-93.

Google Scholar

[20] Fleming L, Sorenson O. Harvard Business Review, 2001, (9): 20-21.

Google Scholar

[21] Ulrich, K. and Eppinger, S. . Boston: McGraw-Hill, (2005).

Google Scholar

[22] Garcia, R. and Calantone, R. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002, 19(4), 110-132.

Google Scholar

[23] Steven C. Wheelwright, Kim B. Clark. Business Horizons, 1992, 35(4), 29-43.

Google Scholar

[24] Martin, Ishii. Research in Engineering Design, 2002, 13(4), 213-235.

Google Scholar

[25] Du,X., Xiao,J., Tseng M.M. Concuttent Engineering: Research and Application, 2001, 9(4), 103-119.

Google Scholar

[26] Jiao. International Journal of Mass Customization, 2006, 1(2-3), 237-259.

Google Scholar

[27] Pil, F. , Holweg, M. Interfaces, 2004, 34(5), 394-403.

Google Scholar

[28] Hieber, R. Supply Chain Management: A Collaborative Performance Measurement Approach[M], Zurch: VDF, (2002).

Google Scholar

[29] Fine, C. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage[M], New York: Perseus Books, (1995).

Google Scholar

[30] Sturgeon, T. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2002, 11(3), 451-466.

Google Scholar

[31] Abdelkafi, N. Variety-Induced Complexity in Mass Customization: Concepts and Management[M], Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, (2008).

Google Scholar

[32] Randall, T. , Ulrich, K. Management Science, 2001, 47(12), 588-604.

Google Scholar

[33] Caridi, M., Pero, M., Sianesi, A. Proceedings of the Exxpand 2008, Bordeaux, France, 20-21 March.

Google Scholar

[34] Selldin,E., Olhager,J. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2007, 12(1), 42-51.

Google Scholar

[35] Salvador, F., Forza, C. , Rungtusanatham, M. Journal of Operations Management, 2002, 20(5), 549-575.

Google Scholar

[36] Zhaohui Wu: Supplier-supplier interactions and their effects on supply performance: an empirical study, A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the PHD.; Arizona State University, August (2003).

Google Scholar