Textural and Color Changes of Red Sea Bream (Pagrosomus major) during Storage at 0°C

Article Preview

Abstract:

The freshness of red sea bream stored under 0°C was analyzed by physical methods, the indicators including the texture, color difference and water holding capacity. The hardness, springiness and cohesiveness showed fluctuant decrease during the storage of 21 days. All of them correlated negatively with the storage time (r=-0.61, -0.60 and-0.68, respectively). While the gumminess and chewiness did not show evident correlations with time. The values of resilience were decreased significantly with storage time (r=-0.81). The L* values kept increasing within the first 12 days of storage, and then decreased until the end of storage. The a* values decreased with the over time, while the increase of b* values were observed. The water holding capacity decreased within 9 days and then increased in the following 6 days. However, 15 days later, it decreased again. The results showed that the resilience, b* values and water holding capacity significantly correlated with the storage time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1010-1012)

Pages:

1797-1800

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Szczesniak AS. Texture is a sensory property, Food Quality and Preference. vol. 13 (2002), pp.215-225.

DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(01)00039-8

Google Scholar

[2] Veland JO, Torrissen OJ. The texture of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) muscle as measured instrumentally using TPA and Warner–Brazler shear test, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. vol. 79 (1999), pp.1737-1746.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(199909)79:12<1737::aid-jsfa432>3.0.co;2-y

Google Scholar

[3] Dowlati M, Mohtasebi SS, Omid M, Razavi SH, Jamzad M, de la Guardia M. Freshness assessment of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) by machine vision based on gill and eye color changes, Journal of Food Engineering. vol. 119 (2013), pp.277-287.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.05.023

Google Scholar

[4] Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes, Meat Sci. vol. 71 ( 2005), pp.194-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022

Google Scholar

[5] Jo C, Lee J, Ahn D. Lipid oxidation, color changes and volatiles production in irradiated pork sausage with different fat content and packaging during storage, Meat Sci. vol. 51 (1999), pp.355-361.

DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(98)00134-x

Google Scholar

[6] Hussain S. Effect of protein isolate on water-holding capacity and quality of tilapia fish muscle: University of Florida; (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] Martinez I, Wang PA, Slizyté R, Jorge A, Dahle SW, Cañas B, et al. Protein expression and enzymatic activities in normal and soft textured Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) muscle, Food Chemistry. vol. 126 (2011), pp.140-148.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.10.090

Google Scholar

[8] Olafsdottir G, Nesvadba P, Di Natale C, Careche M, Oehlenschläger J, Tryggvadottir SV, et al. Multisensor for fish quality determination, Trends in food science & technology. vol. 15 (2004), pp.86-93.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2003.08.006

Google Scholar

[9] Robb D, Kestin S, Warriss P. Muscle activity at slaughter: I. Changes in flesh colour and gaping in rainbow trout, Aquaculture. vol. 182 ( 2000), pp.261-269.

DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(99)00273-2

Google Scholar

[10] Canto A, Lima B, Cruz A, Lázaro C, Freitas D, Faria JA, et al. Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on the color and texture parameters of refrigerated Caiman (Caiman crocodilus yacare) tail meat, Meat Sci. vol. 91 ( 2012), pp.255-260.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.01.023

Google Scholar

[11] Pearce KL, Rosenvold K, Andersen HJ, Hopkins DL. Water distribution and mobility in meat during the conversion of muscle to meat and ageing and the impacts on fresh meat quality attributes—A review, Meat Sci. vol. 89 (2011), pp.111-124.

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.007

Google Scholar