Study on Identification of Contact Stiffness Considering Surface Roughness

Article Preview

Abstract:

In previous study, the quantitative measurement method of contact stiffness of the joint considering real contact area is developed by experimental approach. However, the measurement of contact stiffness needs special device and skillful measuring technique. Therefore, in this paper, simplified calculation method with material properties and profile data of surface roughness obtained by profilometer is considered. As a result, real contact area, contact stiffness and contact spring stiffness calculated from specific wavelength of rough surface are near agreement with experimental value. Hence, it is revealed that there is dominant configuration in surface roughness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

441-446

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Ito, Modular design for machine tools, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, New York, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Z.M. Levina, Research on the static stiffness of joint in machine tools, Proc. of the 8th Int. MTDR Conf. Part2 (1967) 737-758.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Ito, S. Itoh, Contact Pattern Measurement by Means of Ultrasonic Waves: Art of Present and Some Improvements of its Performance, J. Vib. Acous. Trans. ASME. 105 (1983) 237-241.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3269092

Google Scholar

[4] S. Shimizu, K. Nakamura, H. Sakamoto, Quantitative Measurement Method of Contact Stiffness of the Joint with Different Material Combination. J. Adv. Mech. Des. Sys. Manuf. 4 5 (2010) 1144-1153.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Shimizu, K. Nakamura, H. Sakamoto, Relationship between longitudinal elastic modulus and contact stiffness of Differenet Material Combination, Proc. 4th CIRP HPC, C30 (2010) 195-200.

Google Scholar

[6] J.A. Greenwood, J.B.P. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A295 (1966) 300-319.

Google Scholar

[7] T.R. Thomas, Rough surfaces second edition, Imperial College Press, London, (1999).

Google Scholar

[8] K.L. Johnson, Contact mechanics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (1985).

Google Scholar

[9] A.A. Polycarpou, I. Etsion, Analytical approximations in modeling contacting rough surfaces, J. Tribol. Trans. ASME, 121. 2 (1999) 234-239.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2833926

Google Scholar

[10] H. Hertz, Miscellaneous papers. Macmillan and Co., New York, 1896.

Google Scholar

[11] I.N. Sneddon, The Relation Between Load and Penetration in the Axisymmetric Boussinesq Problem for a Punch of Arbitrary Profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, (1985) 47-57.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4

Google Scholar

[12] G.M. Pharr, W.C. Oliver, F.R. Brtzen, On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation. J. Mat. Res, 7, 3, (1992) 613-617.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1992.0613

Google Scholar

[13] K. Nakamura, S. Shimizu, H. Sakamoto, Estimation method of contact stiffness of joint based on surface profile measurement, Proc of the 6th International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st Century, #3404 (2011).

DOI: 10.1299/jsmelem.2011.6._3404-1_

Google Scholar