Technology Study on the Perception of Stereopsis in Fovea Field

Article Preview

Abstract:

Random-dot stereograms were used as stimuli to investigate the perception of stereopsis in fovea field. The response of every subject was recorded in different positions in the fovea field: upper, lower, left, right field and with different eccentricities of 1.39º, 1.93º, 2.48º, 3.02º, 3.57º. The results showed that reaction times increased with increasing eccentricities wherever the disparity zone was presented relative to the fixation point. No significant differences were found between reaction times to the upper and lower visual fields. And there were no significant differences between left and right visual field. But there were marked superiorities for reaction times between upper and right field at all eccentricities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

341-344

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Marc L, Wijnand I. Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Display: A Review. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology. 2009, 53(3): 03020101-03020114.

Google Scholar

[2] Céline Devisme, BjÖrn Drobe etc. Stereoscopic depth perception in peripheral field and global processing of horizontal disparity gradient pattern. Vision Research. 2008, 48: 753-764.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.003

Google Scholar

[3] Simon J.D. Prince, Brian J. Rogers. Sensitivity to disparity corrugations in peripheral vision. Vision Research. 1998, 38: 2533-2537.

DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00118-7

Google Scholar

[4] Nirel W, Robert F H. Mechanisms underlying global stereopsis in fovea and periphery. Vision Research. 2013, 87: 10-21.

DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.003

Google Scholar

[5] Yan S M. Digital stereoscopic Test Charts. People's medical publishing house, (1985).

Google Scholar

[6] Hiroshi M, Nobuyuki S etc. The magnitude of stereopsis in peripheral visual fields. Kitasato Med J 2012, 42: 1-5.

Google Scholar

[7] Daniel PM, Whitteridge D. The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J Physiol. 1961, 159: 203-21.

DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006803

Google Scholar

[8] Curcio CA, Allen KA, Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol, 1990, 300: 5-25.

DOI: 10.1002/cne.903000103

Google Scholar

[9] Zhe Qu, Silu Fan, Yulong Ding, Yan Song, Lin Chen. Functional asymmetry between upper and lower visual fields under sustained attention: an event-related potential study in humans. Neuroscience letters(under review).

Google Scholar

[10] Sihua Xu, Zhe Qu etc. A research on Asymmetry between the upper and lower Visual Fields. Psychological Science, 2007, 30(1): 131-133.

Google Scholar

[11] He S, Cavanaugh P, Intrilligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 1996, 383: 334-337.

DOI: 10.1038/383334a0

Google Scholar

[12] Rubin N, Nakayama K, Shapley R. Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower versus upper visual hemifields. Science, 1996, 271: 651-653.

DOI: 10.1126/science.271.5249.651

Google Scholar