A Research on Characteristics of Spatial-Temporal Variations of China's Rural Collective Enterprises over the Past 20 Years

Abstract:

After the late 1980s when property rights reform has widely occurred in rural industrial enterprises, by using industrial enterprises data in 1988-2011 and analyzing the spatial-temporal characteristics of the number proportion of rural collective enterprises, we conclude:(1) The number proportion change of rural industrial collective enterprises corresponds with the policy guidance that was released in each phase to improve enterprises competitiveness;(2) The three phases shows reform had a hierarchical characteristic. Compared to the central and western regions, the eastern reform tends to be more mature;(3) Eastern proportion is most highest, the proportion ranking top provinces are almost on the eastern coast and they have a inertial feature.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1030-1032)
• Pages: 2501-2510
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1030-1032.2501
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: Lei Niu, Yu Hua Wang, Chen Chen
• Keywords: Collective Enterprises Proportion, Property Rights Reform, Rural Industry, Spatial-Temporal Characteristic

References

[1] Z.Y. Mi: Rural Enterprise's Contribution to The Rural Economic Development and Its Influence Factors. J. Chinese Rural Economy, Number 12 (2009), pp.11-23.

[2] Y. Y Guo: The Evolution of The Township Collective Enterprises property Rights Characteristics. J. Rural Economy, Number 5 (2006), pp.25-28.

[3] Chinese Township Enterprises and Agro-industries Yearbook in 1989, 1992~2012, edited by T. Z Zhang, et al. China Agriculture Press, Beijing.

[4] Y. F Wu: SOEs Property Right Reform and Marx Property Rights Theory. J. Social Sciences In China, Number 1 (1995), pp.4-24.

[5] G. Q Tian: The Property Rights Structure and Its Reform of China's Township Enterprises. J. Economic Research Journal, Number 3 (1995), pp.35-39, 13.

[6] Garry H Jefferson, Jian Su, Jiang Yuan, et al.: The impact of shareholding reform on Chinese enterprise performance, 1995—2001, in: John Nellis, Nancy, Birdsall(Eds. ), Reality Check: Assessing the Distributional Impact of Privatization. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, (2005).

DOI: 10.1017/s0022216x08004951

[7] Dong Xiaoyuan, Louis Putterman, and Bulent Unel, Privatization and Firm Performance : A Comparison between Rural and Urban Enterprises in China. J. Comparative Economics, Vol. 34, Number 3 (2006), pp.608-633.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2006.06.005

[8] H. B Li, R Scott: Insider Privatization with a Tail: The Screening Contract and Performance of Privatized Firms in Rural China. J. Development Economics, Number 75 (2004), pp.1-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.08.001

[9] L. Hurwicz: On Informational Decentralization and Efficiency in Resourse Allocation Mechanism, in: Studies in Mathematical Economics, ed. by S. Reiter, Mathematical Association of America. (1986).

[10] G. Tian and Q. Li: An Implementable and Informationally Efficient State—Ownership System with General Varible Returns. J. Economic Theory, Number 64, (1994), pp.286-297.

DOI: 10.1006/jeth.1994.1069

[11] G. Tian and Q. Li: Ratio—Lindahl Equilibria and an Informationally Efficient and Impementable Mixed—Ownership System. J. Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming, Vol. 26, Number 3 (1995), pp.391-411.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)00045-g

[12] G. X Wu: Marxist Theory of Property Rights. J. Contemporary Economic Research, Number 10 (2006), pp.1-6.

[13] X Lin: The Finance Problems of Township Enterprises in The Financial Markets. J. Modern Economic Information, Number 1 (2012), p.33.

[14] Z. S Li: The Development and Influence Factors of Chinese Township Enterprises. J. Research On Economics and Management, Number 3 (2003), pp.24-27.