Experimental Investigation to Evaluate the Optimum Performance of Helical Coiled Tube with Insert and Nano-Fluid

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present work an experimental investigation is carried out to evaluate the performance of helical coiled tube with the swirl flow device using Al2O3nanofluid.The effects of wire coil insert with different parameter on heat transfer and friction loss in the helical tube were examined with Dean number (De) ranging from 700 to 2000. The circular or square coil wire has different cross sections, insertedin the tube with different pitch. The wire coil with Al2O3 nanoparticles with a diameter of 80nm dispersed in distilled water with volume concentrations of (0.08,0.1, 0.2and 0.3 vol.% ) were used as the test fluid. The effects of Dean Number, volume concentration of suspended nanoparticles, and wire coil on heat characteristics were investigated. The results reveal that the use of tabulators leads to a considerable increase in heat transfer and friction loss over those of a smooth tube. The Nusselt number increases with increasing of Dean number and reduction in pitch of wire coil. The square type of wire coil provides slightly higher heat transfer than the circular under the same conditions. Results show that the optimum heat transfer is caused of P=15mm of wire coils. Adding nanoparticles to the base fluid causes a significant enhancement in heat transfer characteristics. The overall enhancement in heat transfer using two mechanisms simultaneously compared to using pure fluid within the smooth helical tube exceeds over 213.2% (180% spring enhancement +33.2%Al2O3). The optimum results were found to be P=15mm, φ=0. 3Al2O3 t=2mm square cross section and De=1889. Finally, empirical correlations are developed of predicting Nusselt number of the flow with and without nanofluid. Comparison between the present result in reference results show good agreement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

89-94

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Wang, B. Suden, Performance Comparison of Some Tube Inserts, International Communication Heat and Mass Transfer 29 (2002) 45–56.

DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1933(01)00323-2

Google Scholar

[2] P. Naphon, Thermal Performance and Pressure Drop of the Helical –Coil Heat Exchangers with and Without Helically Crimped Fins, International Communication in Heat and Mass Transfer 34(3) (2007) 321-330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2006.11.009

Google Scholar

[3] P. Promvonge, Thermal Augmentation in Circular Tube with Twisted Tape and Wire Coil Turbulators, Energy Conversation Management 49 (2008) 2949–2955.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.06.022

Google Scholar

[4] A. Zachar, Analysis of Coiled –Tube Heat Exchangers to Improve Heat Transfer Rate with Spirally Corrugated Wall, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 53 (2010) 3928-3939.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.05.011

Google Scholar

[5] M. Saeedinia, M. A. Akhavan Behabadi, M. Nasr, Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of Nanofluid Flow in a Horizontal Coiled Wire Inserted Tube under Constant Heat Flux, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 36 (2012) 158-168.

DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2011.09.009

Google Scholar

[6] N. Kannadasan, K. Ramanathan, Comparison of Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Horizontal and Vertical Helically Coiled Heat Exchanger with CuO/Water Based Nanofluids, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 42 (2012) 64-70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.031

Google Scholar

[7] M.R. Salimpour, Heat Transfer coefficients of Shell and Coiled Tube Heat Exchangers, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 33 (2009) 203-207.

DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.07.015

Google Scholar

[8] N. Ghorbani, H. Taherian, M. Gorji and H. Mirgolbabae, Experimental Study of Mixed Convection Heat Transfer in Vertical Helically Coiled Tube Heat Exchangers , Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 34 (2010) 900-905.

DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.02.004

Google Scholar

[9] W. Yu, S.U.S. Choi, The Role of Interface Layers in the Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluids: A Renovated Maxwell Model, Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5 (2003) 167-171.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1024438603801

Google Scholar

[10] X. Wang, X. Xu, Thermal Conductivity of Nanoparticles–Fluid Mixture, Journal of Thermophysics Heat Transfer 13 (1999) 474-480.

DOI: 10.2514/2.6486

Google Scholar

[11] C.E. Kalb, J. D. Seader, Fully Developed Viscous – Flow Heat Transfer in Curved Circular Tubes with Uniform Wall Temperature, AICHE Journal 20 (1974) 340-346.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690200220

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Cengiz, B. Yasar, P. Dursun , Heat Transfer and Pressure Drops in a heat exchanger with helical Pipe Containing Inside Springs, Energy Conservation Management 38 (1997) 619-624.

DOI: 10.1016/s0196-8904(96)00040-4

Google Scholar

[13] R. C. Xin, M. A. Ebadian, The Effect of Prandtle Number on Local and Average Heat Transfer coefficient in Helical Pipe, Journal of Heat and Mass 119 (1997) 463-467.

Google Scholar

[14] L. Guo, Z. Feng, X. Chen, Pressure Drop Oscillation of Steam – Water Two – Phase Flow in a Helically Coiled Tube, International Journal Heat and Mass Transfer 44 (2001) 1555-1564.

DOI: 10.1016/s0017-9310(00)00211-8

Google Scholar

[15] V. Trisaksri, Critical Review of Heat Transfer Characteristic of Nanofluid, National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (2006) http: /www. energy-based. nrct. go. th/article.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Garcia, P. G. Vicente, A. Viedma, Experimental Study of Heat Transfer Enhancement with Wire Coil Inserts in Laminar – Transition – Turbulent Regimes at Different Prandtle Numbers, International Journal Heat and Mass Transfer 48 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.04.024

Google Scholar